231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28420623)
1. Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness.
Ang BFH; Chen JY; Yew AKS; Chua SK; Chou SM; Chia SL; Koh JSB; Howe TS
Bone Joint Res; 2017 Apr; 6(4):216-223. PubMed ID: 28420623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stiffness of the locking compression plate as an external fixator for treating distal tibial fractures: a biomechanics study.
Liu W; Yang L; Kong X; An L; Hong G; Guo Z; Zang L
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jan; 18(1):26. PubMed ID: 28103852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of Kryptonite™ bone cement in hybrid screw configurations of locking plate humeral midshaft fixation: A study of surrogate bone model.
Le TT; Vo HV; Webb LX
J Orthop; 2016 Sep; 13(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 27408488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?
Stoffel K; Dieter U; Stachowiak G; Gächter A; Kuster MS
Injury; 2003 Nov; 34 Suppl 2():B11-9. PubMed ID: 14580982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical study of the stiffness of the femoral locking compression plate of an external fixator for lower tibial fractures.
Su H; Zhong S; Ma T; Wu W; Lu Y; Wang D
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jan; 24(1):39. PubMed ID: 36650508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stiffness of a type II external skeletal fixator and locking compression plate in a fracture gap model.
Muro NM; Gilley RS; Kemper AR; Benitez ME; Barry SL; McNally C
Vet Surg; 2021 Apr; 50(3):622-632. PubMed ID: 33404123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of gourd-shaped LCP versus LCP for fixation of comminuted tibial shaft fracture.
Xu GH; Liu B; Zhang Q; Wang J; Chen W; Liu YJ; Peng AQ; Zhang YZ
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2013 Apr; 33(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 23592139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metaphyseal locking plate as an external fixator for open tibial fracture: Clinical outcomes and biomechanical assessment.
Ma CH; Wu CH; Jiang JR; Tu YK; Lin TS
Injury; 2017 Feb; 48(2):501-505. PubMed ID: 27919511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of two locking plate systems for the distal tibia.
Högel F; Hoffmann S; Weninger P; Bühren V; Augat P
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2012 Feb; 38(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 26815674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model.
Snow M; Thompson G; Turner PG
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18349780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?
Ahmad M; Nanda R; Bajwa AS; Candal-Couto J; Green S; Hui AC
Injury; 2007 Mar; 38(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17296199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.
Heiney JP; Barnett MD; Vrabec GA; Schoenfeld AJ; Baji A; Njus GO
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 19204519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do Transcortical Screws in a Locking Plate Construct Improve the Stiffness in the Fixation of Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures? A Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Different Plating Constructs.
Lochab J; Carrothers A; Wong E; McLachlin S; Aldebeyan W; Jenkinson R; Whyne C; Nousiainen MT
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Jan; 31(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 28002219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and a novel pedicle screw external fixation to repair equine mandibular fractures.
Monck SL; McGilvray KC; Easley JT
Vet Surg; 2020 Jul; 49(5):997-1006. PubMed ID: 32294301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical comparison of 3.5 locking compression plate fixation to 3.5 limited contact dynamic compression plate fixation in a canine cadaveric distal humeral metaphyseal gap model.
Filipowicz D; Lanz O; McLaughlin R; Elder S; Werre S
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2009; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19597629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel adjustable dynamic plate for treatment of long bone fractures: An in vitro biomechanical study.
Karakasli A; Acar N; Karaarslan A; Ertem F; Havitcioglu H
J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2016; 7(Suppl 2):177-183. PubMed ID: 28053382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of 2.4 mm LCP plate rod constructs versus 2.7 mm LCP applied to the feline tibia.
Gutbrod A; Longo F; Affentranger R; Ferguson SJ; Pozzi A; Knell SC
Vet Surg; 2024 May; 53(4):710-716. PubMed ID: 37818951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of a 3.5 mm locking compression plate applied cranially and a 2.7 mm locking compression plate applied medially in a gap model of the distal aspect of the canine radius.
Uhl JM; Kapatkin AS; Garcia TC; Stover SM
Vet Surg; 2013 Oct; 42(7):840-6. PubMed ID: 24033354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Femoral periprosthetic fracture treatment using the Ortho-Bridge System: a biomechanical study.
Long Y; Qi Y; Zuo G; Zhang Q; Liu Z; Wang W
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Jun; 17(1):301. PubMed ID: 35659004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigating the biomechanical function of the plate-type external fixator in the treatment of tibial fractures: a biomechanical study.
Shi D; Liu K; Zhang H; Wang X; Li G; Zheng L
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):128. PubMed ID: 32106851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
