These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28421611)

  • 21. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging.
    Lee NA; Rusinek H; Weinreb J; Chandra R; Toth H; Singer C; Newstead G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 9016235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patient-derived heterogeneous breast phantoms for advanced dosimetry in mammography and tomosynthesis.
    Caballo M; Rabin C; Fedon C; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Diaz O; Boone JM; Dance DR; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5423-5438. PubMed ID: 35635844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
    Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Single x-ray absorptiometry method for the quantitative mammographic measure of fibroglandular tissue volume.
    Malkov S; Wang J; Kerlikowske K; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5525-36. PubMed ID: 20095265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Technical feasibility proof for high-resolution low-dose photon-counting CT of the breast.
    Kalender WA; Kolditz D; Steiding C; Ruth V; Lück F; Rößler AC; Wenkel E
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1081-1086. PubMed ID: 27306559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A new mammography dosimetric phantom.
    Almeida CD; Coutinho CM; Dantas BM; Peixoto JE; Koch HA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):196-8. PubMed ID: 22223722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantification of breast density using dual-energy mammography with liquid phantom calibration.
    Lam AR; Ding H; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(14):3985-4000. PubMed ID: 24971873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantification of water and lipid density with dual-energy mammography: validation in postmortem breasts.
    Molloi S; Ding H; Cho HM; Beidokhti D
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):938-946. PubMed ID: 32845386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Breast density evaluation using spectral mammography, radiologist reader assessment, and segmentation techniques: a retrospective study based on left and right breast comparison.
    Molloi S; Ding H; Feig S
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Aug; 22(8):1052-9. PubMed ID: 26031229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital mammography screening with photon-counting technique: can a high diagnostic performance be realized at low mean glandular dose?
    Weigel S; Berkemeyer S; Girnus R; Sommer A; Lenzen H; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2014 May; 271(2):345-55. PubMed ID: 24495234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
    Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characterization of photon-counting multislit breast tomosynthesis.
    Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 29159881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measurement of breast density with dual X-ray absorptiometry: feasibility.
    Shepherd JA; Kerlikowske KM; Smith-Bindman R; Genant HK; Cummings SR
    Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):554-7. PubMed ID: 11997567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients from experimental mammographic x-ray spectra.
    Santos JC; Tomal A; de Barros N; Costa PR
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105010. PubMed ID: 30959490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
    Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. X-ray properties of an anthropomorphic breast phantom for MRI and x-ray imaging.
    Freed M; Badal A; Jennings RJ; de las Heras H; Myers KJ; Badano A
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 56(12):3513-33. PubMed ID: 21606556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Compositional breast imaging using a dual-energy mammography protocol.
    Laidevant AD; Malkov S; Flowers CI; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):164-74. PubMed ID: 20175478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Experimental spectral measurements of heavy K-edge filtered beams for x-ray computed mammotomography.
    Crotty DJ; McKinley RL; Tornai MP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):603-16. PubMed ID: 17228108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. X-ray scattering from human breast tissues and breast-equivalent materials.
    Poletti ME; Gonçalves D; Mazzaro I
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Jan; 47(1):47-63. PubMed ID: 11814227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
    James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.