BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28421669)

  • 1. Misfortune may be a blessing in disguise: Fairness perception and emotion modulate decision making.
    Liu HH; Hwang YD; Hsieh MH; Hsu YF; Lai WS
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Aug; 54(8):1163-1179. PubMed ID: 28421669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidental emotions influence risk preference and outcome evaluation.
    Zhao D; Gu R; Tang P; Yang Q; Luo YJ
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Oct; 53(10):1542-51. PubMed ID: 27354122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decision Preceding Negativity in the Iowa Gambling Task: an ERP study.
    Bianchin M; Angrilli A
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 21306813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological correlates of decision-making in high-risk versus low-risk conditions of a gambling game.
    Yang J; Zhang Q
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1456-61. PubMed ID: 21913928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How we learn to make decisions: rapid propagation of reinforcement learning prediction errors in humans.
    Krigolson OE; Hassall CD; Handy TC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):635-44. PubMed ID: 24168216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The interaction between state and dispositional emotions in decision making: An ERP study.
    Wang Y; Gu R; Luo YJ; Zhou C
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Feb; 123():126-135. PubMed ID: 27887980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An electrophysiological monetary incentive delay (e-MID) task: a way to decompose the different components of neural response to positive and negative monetary reinforcement.
    Broyd SJ; Richards HJ; Helps SK; Chronaki G; Bamford S; Sonuga-Barke EJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Jul; 209(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 22659003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. You did not mean it: Perceived good intentions alleviate sense of unfairness.
    Ma Q; Meng L; Zhang Z; Xu Q; Wang Y; Shen Q
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jun; 96(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 25863263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feedback-related negativity is enhanced in adolescence during a gambling task with and without probabilistic reinforcement learning.
    Martínez-Velázquez ES; Ramos-Loyo J; González-Garrido AA; Sequeira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Jan; 26(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 25494471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociation between medial frontal negativity and cardiac responses in the ultimatum game: Effects of offer size and fairness.
    Van der Veen FM; Sahibdin PP
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 11(4):516-25. PubMed ID: 21786030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological correlates reflect the integration of model-based and model-free decision information.
    Eppinger B; Walter M; Li SC
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 17(2):406-421. PubMed ID: 28050805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oscillatory profiles of positive, negative and neutral feedback stimuli during adaptive decision making.
    Li P; Baker TE; Warren C; Li H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Sep; 107():37-43. PubMed ID: 27378537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of loss aversion on neural responses to loss outcomes: An event-related potential study.
    Kokmotou K; Cook S; Xie Y; Wright H; Soto V; Fallon N; Giesbrecht T; Pantelous A; Stancak A
    Biol Psychol; 2017 May; 126():30-40. PubMed ID: 28396213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal prediction modulates the evaluative processing of "good" action feedback: An electrophysiological study.
    Kimura K; Kimura M; Iwaki S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Oct; 53(10):1552-9. PubMed ID: 27412662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-Related Potentials Are Associated With Unexpected Gain and Loss: Using a Gambling Paradigm.
    Krause D; Jobst A; Langemak SM; Keeser D; Chrobok AI; Langgartner S; Adorjan K; Gertzen M; Pogarell O; Karch S
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2019 May; 50(3):154-160. PubMed ID: 30477341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus-preceding negativity represents a conservative response tendency.
    Hirao T; Murphy TI; Masaki H
    Neuroreport; 2016 Jan; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 26626414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trait anxiety and probabilistic learning: Behavioral and electrophysiological findings.
    Jiang D; Zhang D; Chen Y; He Z; Gao Q; Gu R; Xu P
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Feb; 132():17-26. PubMed ID: 29100909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Problem gamblers exhibit reward hypersensitivity in medial frontal cortex during gambling.
    Oberg SA; Christie GJ; Tata MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Nov; 49(13):3768-75. PubMed ID: 21982697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incidental positive emotion modulates neural response to outcome valence in a monetarily rewarded gambling task.
    Bandyopadhyay D; Pammi VSC; Srinivasan N
    Prog Brain Res; 2019; 247():219-251. PubMed ID: 31196435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implicit emotion regulation affects outcome evaluation.
    Yang Q; Tang P; Gu R; Luo W; Luo YJ
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 10(6):824-31. PubMed ID: 25332404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.