237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28421885)
21. Real-time Responsiveness for Ethics Oversight During Disaster Research.
Eckenwiler L; Pringle J; Boulanger R; Hunt M
Bioethics; 2015 Nov; 29(9):653-61. PubMed ID: 26481207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How not to rethink research ethics.
Beauchamp TL
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Challenges and proposed solutions in making clinical research on COVID-19 ethical: a status quo analysis across German research ethics committees.
Faust A; Sierawska A; Krüger K; Wisgalla A; Hasford J; Strech D
BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):96. PubMed ID: 34281535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ethical practice in internet research involving vulnerable people: lessons from a self-harm discussion forum study (SharpTalk).
Sharkey S; Jones R; Smithson J; Hewis E; Emmens T; Ford T; Owens C
J Med Ethics; 2011 Dec; 37(12):752-8. PubMed ID: 21947802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. On the Alleged Right to Participate in High-Risk Research.
Różyńska J
Bioethics; 2015 Sep; 29(7):451-61. PubMed ID: 25644532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics.
Garrard E; Dawson A
J Med Ethics; 2005 Jul; 31(7):419-23. PubMed ID: 15994364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A relational ethical dialogue with research ethics committees.
Larkin PJ; de Casterlé BD; Schotsmans P
Nurs Ethics; 2008 Mar; 15(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 18272613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Vulnerability of pregnant women in clinical research.
van der Zande ISE; van der Graaf R; Oudijk MA; van Delden JJM
J Med Ethics; 2017 Oct; 43(10):657-663. PubMed ID: 28716977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Moving Forward on Consent Practices in Australia.
McWhirter RE; Eckstein L
J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Jun; 15(2):243-257. PubMed ID: 29532387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. "There Are No Known Benefits . . .": Considering the Risk/Benefit Ratio of Qualitative Research.
Opsal T; Wolgemuth J; Cross J; Kaanta T; Dickmann E; Colomer S; Erdil-Moody Z
Qual Health Res; 2016 Jul; 26(8):1137-50. PubMed ID: 25857654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined.
Angell EL; Bryman A; Ashcroft RE; Dixon-Woods M
Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Apr; 17(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18385408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Consenting for current genetic research: is Canadian practice adequate?
Jaitovich Groisman I; Egalite N; Godard B
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():80. PubMed ID: 25410958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Some questionable premises about research ethics.
Macklin R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):29-31; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees.
Burgess T; Rennie S; Moodley K
BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Feb; 24(1):11. PubMed ID: 36793067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Payment of research participants: current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees.
Roche E; King R; Mohan HM; Gavin B; McNicholas F
J Med Ethics; 2013 Sep; 39(9):591-3. PubMed ID: 23204324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Research ethics for clinical researchers.
Harnett JD; Neuman R
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():19-30. PubMed ID: 25694302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Qualitative research ethics on the spot: Not only on the desktop.
Øye C; Sørensen NØ; Glasdam S
Nurs Ethics; 2016 Jun; 23(4):455-64. PubMed ID: 25665588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ethics in qualitative health research.
Oberle KM
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 2002 Dec; 35(8 Suppl.):563-6. PubMed ID: 15015501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Research ethics committees and paternalism.
Edwards SJ; Kirchin S; Huxtable R
J Med Ethics; 2004 Feb; 30(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 14872083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
Angell E; Dixon-Woods M
J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 19181888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
