BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28422598)

  • 21. Direct restorative materials use in Australia in 2002.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Randall RC; Meyers IA; Pitt J; Hall AC
    Aust Dent J; 2004 Dec; 49(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 15762339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Changes in dentists' attitudes and practice in paediatric dentistry.
    Roshan D; Curzon ME; Fairpo CG
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Mar; 4(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 12870984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An Assessment of Direct Restorative Material Use in Posterior Teeth by American and Canadian Pediatric Dentists: I. Material Choice.
    Varughese RE; Andrews P; Sigal MJ; Azarpazhooh A
    Pediatr Dent; 2016 Nov; 38(7):489-496. PubMed ID: 28281954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Treatment decisions regarding caries and dental developmental defects in children - a questionnaire-based study among Norwegian dentists.
    Uhlen MM; Valen H; Karlsen LS; Skaare AB; Bletsa A; Ansteinsson V; Mulic A
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 May; 19(1):80. PubMed ID: 31077165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dentists' perspective about dental amalgam: current use and future direction.
    Bakhurji E; Scott T; Mangione T; Sohn W
    J Public Health Dent; 2017 Jun; 77(3):207-215. PubMed ID: 28070905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Hall AC; Randall RC; Widstrom E; Forss H
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jun; 194(11):613-8; discussion 609. PubMed ID: 12819697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom.
    Wilson NH; Burke FJ; Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 10332373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Association between caries location and restorative material treatment provided.
    Lubisich EB; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Pashova HI; Burton B;
    J Dent; 2011 Apr; 39(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 21256915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Composites and amalgam.
    Hiltunen NS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Nov; 142(11):1232-3; author reply 1233-4. PubMed ID: 22041404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Decision to Repair or Replace a Defective Restoration is Affected by Who Placed the Original Restoration: Findings from the National Dental PBRN.
    Gordan VV; Riley J; Geraldeli S; Williams OD; Spoto JC; Gilbert GH;
    Tex Dent J; 2015 Jul; 132(7):448-58. PubMed ID: 26470521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vital pulpotomy in the primary dentition: attitudes and practices of community dental staff in Wales.
    Hingston EJ; Parmar S; Hunter ML
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2007 May; 17(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17397462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Restorative treatment decisions for deep proximal carious lesions in primary molars.
    Qudeimat MA; Al-Saiegh FA; Al-Omari Q; Omar R
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2007 Mar; 8(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 17394889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Postendodontic restoration: a survey among dentists in Switzerland.
    Kon M; Zitzmann NU; Weiger R; Krastl G
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2013; 123(12):1076-88. PubMed ID: 24554584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Teaching and practical guidelines in pulp therapy in primary teeth in Colombia - South America.
    Hincapié S; Fuks A; Mora I; Bautista G; Socarras F
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 25(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 24650083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 3: Dentists' attitudes.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong R
    Aust Dent J; 2016 Dec; 61(4):502-513. PubMed ID: 27016662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. French dentists' restorative treatment decisions.
    Doméjean-Orliaguet S; Tubert-Jeannin S; Riordan PJ; Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2004; 2(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 15646946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors affecting the amount of long-term restorative dental treatment provided to 100 patients by 20 dentists in 3 Adelaide private practices.
    Hawthorne WS; Smales RJ
    Aust Dent J; 1996 Aug; 41(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 8870281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 5: knowledge factors.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong R
    Aust Dent J; 2017 Dec; 62(4):440-452. PubMed ID: 28542834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.