These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28422598)

  • 41. Practitioner, patient and carious lesion characteristics associated with type of restorative material: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Makhija SK; Gordan VV; Gilbert GH; Litaker MS; Rindal DB; Pihlstrom DJ; Qvist V;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jun; 142(6):622-32. PubMed ID: 21628683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Safety of dental restorative materials: a survey of dentists' attitudes.
    Widström E; Forss H
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1991; 87(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 1749781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Preference for using posts to restore endodontically treated teeth: findings from a survey with dentists.
    Sarkis-Onofre R; Pereira-Cenci T; Opdam NJ; Demarco FF
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-6. PubMed ID: 25387859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM GICs) implications for use in pediatric dentistry.
    Vaikuntam J
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 9189004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An Assessment of Direct Restorative Material Use in Posterior Teeth by American and Canadian Pediatric Dentists: III. Preferred Level of Participation in Decision-making.
    Varughese RE; Andrews P; Sigal MJ; Azarpazhooh A
    Pediatr Dent; 2016 Nov; 38(7):502-508. PubMed ID: 28281956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The influence of practice type, region, and age on treatment recommendations for primary teeth.
    Hanes CM; Myers DR; Dushku JC
    Pediatr Dent; 1992; 14(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 1303523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 1: a review.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong RH
    Aust Dent J; 2014 Dec; 59(4):408-19. PubMed ID: 25090909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Nordic dentists' opinions on the safety of amalgam and other dental restorative materials.
    Widström E; Haugejorden O; Sundberg H; Birn H
    Scand J Dent Res; 1993 Aug; 101(4):238-42. PubMed ID: 8362204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Use of Hall's Technique Preformed Metal Crown (HTPMC) by Pediatric Dentists in Malaysia.
    Jesmin F; Kamarudin A; Baharin F; Ahmad WMABW; Mohammed M; Marya A; Messina P; Alessandro Scardina G; Karobari MI
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():8424206. PubMed ID: 34977246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Interproximal grinding (disking) of caries in primary molars, attitudes and the extent utilized in a Swedish County.
    Granath J; Asztély A; Lundgren T
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2018 Aug; 76(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 29707990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Parental attitudes on restorative materials as factors influencing current use in pediatric dentistry.
    Zimmerman JA; Feigal RJ; Till MJ; Hodges JS
    Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 19320262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. What German dentists choose for their teeth: A Web-based survey of molar restorations and their longevity.
    Beyer C; Schwahn C; Meyer G; Söhnel A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):805-814. PubMed ID: 32444207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Composite Restorations: Wheels of Progress Continue to Turn.
    Vakay R
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Jun; 36(6):442-3. PubMed ID: 26053784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Survey of Dental Materials Used by Dentists for Indirect Restorations in Saudi Arabia.
    Haider Y; Dimashkieh M; Rayyan M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(1):83-85. PubMed ID: 28085988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Alternatives to silver amalgam and resin composite in pediatric dentistry.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):697-703. PubMed ID: 10200719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Materials and techniques for restoration of primary molars by pediatric dentists in Florida.
    Guelmann M; Mjör IA
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 12212875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Provision of specific dental procedures by general dentists in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network: questionnaire findings.
    Gilbert GH; Gordan VV; Korelitz JJ; Fellows JL; Meyerowitz C; Oates TW; Rindal DB; Gregory RJ;
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 Jan; 15():11. PubMed ID: 25608862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Time required to remove totally bonded tooth-colored posterior restorations and related tooth substance loss.
    Krejci I; Lieber CM; Lutz F
    Dent Mater; 1995 Jan; 11(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 7498606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An Assessment of Direct Restorative Material Use in Posterior Teeth by American and Canadian Pediatric Dentists: II. Rubber Dam Isolation.
    Varughese RE; Andrews P; Sigal MJ; Azarpazhooh A
    Pediatr Dent; 2016 Nov; 38(7):497-501. PubMed ID: 28281955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.