122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28423765)
21. Machine learning models in breast cancer survival prediction.
Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Beigzadeh A
Technol Health Care; 2016; 24(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 26409558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict all-cause mortality using fitness data: the Henry ford exercIse testing (FIT) project.
Sakr S; Elshawi R; Ahmed AM; Qureshi WT; Brawner CA; Keteyian SJ; Blaha MJ; Al-Mallah MH
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Dec; 17(1):174. PubMed ID: 29258510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Probabilistic Graphical Modeling for Estimating Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: Applications of a Flexible Machine-Learning Method.
Gupta A; Slater JJ; Boyne D; Mitsakakis N; Béliveau A; Druzdzel MJ; Brenner DR; Hussain S; Arora P
Med Decis Making; 2019 Nov; 39(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 31619130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Intravascular ultrasound-based machine learning for predicting fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery lesions.
Lee JG; Ko J; Hae H; Kang SJ; Kang DY; Lee PH; Ahn JM; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ
Atherosclerosis; 2020 Jan; 292():171-177. PubMed ID: 31809986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Finding distinctions between oral cancer and periodontitis using saliva metabolites and machine learning.
Kouznetsova VL; Li J; Romm E; Tsigelny IF
Oral Dis; 2021 Apr; 27(3):484-493. PubMed ID: 32762095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An automated ranking platform for machine learning regression models for meat spoilage prediction using multi-spectral imaging and metabolic profiling.
Estelles-Lopez L; Ropodi A; Pavlidis D; Fotopoulou J; Gkousari C; Peyrodie A; Panagou E; Nychas GJ; Mohareb F
Food Res Int; 2017 Sep; 99(Pt 1):206-215. PubMed ID: 28784477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Identifying relatively high-risk group of coronary artery calcification based on progression rate: statistical and machine learning methods.
Kim HY; Yoo S; Lee J; Kam HJ; Woo KG; Choi YH; Sung J; Kang M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():2202-5. PubMed ID: 23366360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predicting diabetes mellitus using SMOTE and ensemble machine learning approach: The Henry Ford ExercIse Testing (FIT) project.
Alghamdi M; Al-Mallah M; Keteyian S; Brawner C; Ehrman J; Sakr S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179805. PubMed ID: 28738059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Application of Machine Learning to Identify Clustering of Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in U.S. Adults.
Liao X; Kerr D; Morales J; Duncan I
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2019 May; 21(5):245-253. PubMed ID: 30969131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Prediction of antiepileptic drug treatment outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy by machine learning.
Yao L; Cai M; Chen Y; Shen C; Shi L; Guo Y
Epilepsy Behav; 2019 Jul; 96():92-97. PubMed ID: 31121513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A machine learning-based framework to identify type 2 diabetes through electronic health records.
Zheng T; Xie W; Xu L; He X; Zhang Y; You M; Yang G; Chen Y
Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():120-127. PubMed ID: 27919371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis; Ranking the Significant Features Using a Random Trees Model.
Joloudari JH; Joloudari EH; Saadatfar H; GhasemiGol M; Razavi SM; Mosavi A; Nabipour N; Shamshirband S; Nadai L
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jan; 17(3):. PubMed ID: 31979257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Site specific prediction of atherosclerotic plaque progression using computational biomechanics and machine learning.
Kigka VI; Sakellarios AI; Tsompou P; Kyriakidis S; Siogkas P; Andrikos I; Michalis LK; Fotiadis DI
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():6998-7001. PubMed ID: 31947449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluating Machine Learning Methods of Analyzing Multiclass Metabolomics.
Gong Y; Ding W; Wang P; Wu Q; Yao X; Yang Q
J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Dec; 63(24):7628-7641. PubMed ID: 38079572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With National Cardiovascular Data Registry Models for Prediction of Risk of Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Mortazavi BJ; Bucholz EM; Desai NR; Huang C; Curtis JP; Masoudi FA; Shaw RE; Negahban SN; Krumholz HM
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Jul; 2(7):e196835. PubMed ID: 31290991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparative evaluation of the generalised predictive ability of eight machine learning algorithms across ten clinical metabolomics data sets for binary classification.
Mendez KM; Reinke SN; Broadhurst DI
Metabolomics; 2019 Nov; 15(12):150. PubMed ID: 31728648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Machine learning algorithm-based risk prediction model of coronary artery disease.
Naushad SM; Hussain T; Indumathi B; Samreen K; Alrokayan SA; Kutala VK
Mol Biol Rep; 2018 Oct; 45(5):901-910. PubMed ID: 29995270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Machine learning-based coronary artery disease diagnosis: A comprehensive review.
Alizadehsani R; Abdar M; Roshanzamir M; Khosravi A; Kebria PM; Khozeimeh F; Nahavandi S; Sarrafzadegan N; Acharya UR
Comput Biol Med; 2019 Aug; 111():103346. PubMed ID: 31288140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predicting Depression Among Community Residing Older Adults: A Use of Machine Learning Approch.
Choi J; Choi J; Choi WJ
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 250():265. PubMed ID: 29857458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction.
Uddin S; Khan A; Hossain ME; Moni MA
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Dec; 19(1):281. PubMed ID: 31864346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
