165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28423913)
1. Application of IATA - A case study in evaluating the global and local performance of a Bayesian network model for skin sensitization.
Fitzpatrick JM; Patlewicz G
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 28(4):297-310. PubMed ID: 28423913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards AOP application--implementation of an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) into a pipeline tool for skin sensitization.
Patlewicz G; Kuseva C; Kesova A; Popova I; Zhechev T; Pavlov T; Roberts DW; Mekenyan O
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Aug; 69(3):529-45. PubMed ID: 24928565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.
Strickland J; Zang Q; Kleinstreuer N; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Lowit A; Allen D; Casey W
J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 36(9):1150-62. PubMed ID: 26851134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Good, The Bad, and The Perplexing: Structural Alerts and Read-Across for Predicting Skin Sensitization Using Human Data.
Golden E; Ukaegbu DC; Ranslow P; Brown RH; Hartung T; Maertens A
Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 May; 36(5):734-746. PubMed ID: 37126467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian integrated testing strategy (ITS) for skin sensitization potency assessment: a decision support system for quantitative weight of evidence and adaptive testing strategy.
Jaworska JS; Natsch A; Ryan C; Strickland J; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
Arch Toxicol; 2015 Dec; 89(12):2355-83. PubMed ID: 26612363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. State of the art in non-animal approaches for skin sensitization testing: from individual test methods towards testing strategies.
Ezendam J; Braakhuis HM; Vandebriel RJ
Arch Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 90(12):2861-2883. PubMed ID: 27629427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A data-based exploration of the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitization points to the necessary requirements for its prediction with alternative methods.
Benigni R; Bossa C; Tcheremenskaia O
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jul; 78():45-52. PubMed ID: 27090483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) and Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSPR) approaches as alternatives to skin sensitization risk assessment.
Kim JY; Kim KB; Lee BM
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2021 Dec; 84(23):945-959. PubMed ID: 34338166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of reactivity schemes for the prediction skin sensitization potential.
Patlewicz G; Roberts DW; Uriarte E
Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 21(2):521-41. PubMed ID: 18189364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of substances found positive in 1 of 3 in vitro tests for skin sensitization.
Kolle SN; Natsch A; Gerberick GF; Landsiedel R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Aug; 106():352-368. PubMed ID: 31112722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Open source software implementation of an integrated testing strategy for skin sensitization potency based on a Bayesian network.
Pirone JR; Smith M; Kleinstreuer NC; Burns TA; Strickland J; Dancik Y; Morris R; Rinckel LA; Casey W; Jaworska JS
ALTEX; 2014; 31(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 24687303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization hazard: Is an integrated testing strategy needed, and if so what should be integrated?
Roberts DW; Patlewicz G
J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28543848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skin sensitization in silico protocol.
Johnson C; Ahlberg E; Anger LT; Beilke L; Benigni R; Bercu J; Bobst S; Bower D; Brigo A; Campbell S; Cronin MTD; Crooks I; Cross KP; Doktorova T; Exner T; Faulkner D; Fearon IM; Fehr M; Gad SC; Gervais V; Giddings A; Glowienke S; Hardy B; Hasselgren C; Hillegass J; Jolly R; Krupp E; Lomnitski L; Magby J; Mestres J; Milchak L; Miller S; Muster W; Neilson L; Parakhia R; Parenty A; Parris P; Paulino A; Paulino AT; Roberts DW; Schlecker H; Stidl R; Suarez-Rodrigez D; Szabo DT; Tice RR; Urbisch D; Vuorinen A; Wall B; Weiler T; White AT; Whritenour J; Wichard J; Woolley D; Zwickl C; Myatt GJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Oct; 116():104688. PubMed ID: 32621976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of a defined approach based on a stacking prediction model to identify skin sensitization hazard.
Tourneix F; Alépée N; Detroyer A; Eilstein J; Martinozzi Teissier S; Nardelli L; Noçairi H; Pauloin T; Piroird C; Del Bufalo A
Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Oct; 60():134-143. PubMed ID: 31100378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating Skin Sensitization Via Soft and Hard Multivariate Modeling.
Silva FALS; Brites G; Ferreira I; Silva A; Miguel Neves B; Costa Pereira JLGFS; Cruz MT
Int J Toxicol; 2020; 39(6):547-559. PubMed ID: 32757797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. TIMES-SS--a promising tool for the assessment of skin sensitization hazard. A characterization with respect to the OECD validation principles for (Q)SARs and an external evaluation for predictivity.
Patlewicz G; Dimitrov SD; Low LK; Kern PS; Dimitrova GD; Comber MI; Aptula AO; Phillips RD; Niemelä J; Madsen C; Wedebye EB; Roberts DW; Bailey PT; Mekenyan OG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 48(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 17467128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjustment of a no expected sensitization induction level derived from Bayesian network integrated testing strategy for skin sensitization risk assessment.
Otsubo Y; Nishijo T; Mizumachi H; Saito K; Miyazawa M; Sakaguchi H
J Toxicol Sci; 2020; 45(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 31932558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SkinSensPred as a Promising in Silico Tool for Integrated Testing Strategy on Skin Sensitization.
Wang SS; Wang CC; Tung CW
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36232156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A mechanistic approach to modeling respiratory sensitization.
Mekenyan O; Patlewicz G; Kuseva C; Popova I; Mehmed A; Kotov S; Zhechev T; Pavlov T; Temelkov S; Roberts DW
Chem Res Toxicol; 2014 Feb; 27(2):219-39. PubMed ID: 24422459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
