These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28426237)

  • 1. On the Complexity of Item Response Theory Models.
    Bonifay W; Cai L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(4):465-484. PubMed ID: 28426237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures.
    Reise SP; Morizot J; Hays RD
    Qual Life Res; 2007; 16 Suppl 1():19-31. PubMed ID: 17479357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying an appropriate measurement modeling approach for the Mini-Mental State Examination.
    Rubright JD; Nandakumar R; Karlawish J
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Feb; 28(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 26029945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing item fit for unidimensional item response theory models using residuals from estimated item response functions.
    Haberman SJ; Sinharay S; Chon KH
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):417-40. PubMed ID: 25106393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian Modal Estimation of the Four-Parameter Item Response Model in Real, Realistic, and Idealized Data Sets.
    Waller NG; Feuerstahler L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):350-370. PubMed ID: 28306347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Item Response Theory True Score Equating for the Bifactor Model Under the Common-Item Nonequivalent Groups Design.
    Kim KY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Sep; 46(6):479-493. PubMed ID: 35991829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing fit of alternative unidimensional polytomous IRT models using posterior predictive model checking.
    Li T; Xie C; Jiao H
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):397-408. PubMed ID: 27243448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The challenges of fitting an item response theory model to the Social Anhedonia Scale.
    Reise SP; Horan WP; Blanchard JJ
    J Pers Assess; 2011 May; 93(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 21516580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rewards of bridging the divide between measurement and clinical theory: demonstration of a bifactor model for the Brief Symptom Inventory.
    Thomas ML
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Mar; 24(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 21767026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.
    Reise SP; Moore TM; Haviland MG
    J Pers Assess; 2010 Nov; 92(6):544-59. PubMed ID: 20954056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating latent constructs with item response models: a MATLAB IRTm toolbox.
    Braeken J; Tuerlinckx F
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1127-37. PubMed ID: 19897820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robustness of Parameter Estimation to Assumptions of Normality in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
    Wang C; Su S; Weiss DJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):403-418. PubMed ID: 29624093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two item response theory models for analysing normative forced-choice personality items.
    Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):379-95. PubMed ID: 17067417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Approximating Bifactor IRT True-Score Equating With a Projective Item Response Model.
    Kim KY; Cho UH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 May; 44(3):215-218. PubMed ID: 32341608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the Bifactor Nominal Response Model Analysis of a Health Efficacy Measure.
    Johnson Preston KS; Han Z
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(2):209-226. PubMed ID: 28009585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How many IRT parameters does it take to model psychopathology items?
    Reise SP; Waller NG
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Jun; 8(2):164-84. PubMed ID: 12924813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introduction to bifactor polytomous item response theory analysis.
    Toland MD; Sulis I; Giambona F; Porcu M; Campbell JM
    J Sch Psychol; 2017 Feb; 60():41-63. PubMed ID: 28164798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lord-Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.0 for Hierarchical Item Factor Models with Applications in Test Scoring, Scale Alignment, and Model Fit Testing.
    Cai L
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):535-59. PubMed ID: 25233839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.