359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28426462)
21. Benchmarks for the interpretation of esophageal high-resolution manometry.
Yadlapati R; Keswani RN; Dunbar KB; Gawron AJ; Gyawali CP; Kahrilas PJ; Katz PO; Katzka D; Spechler SJ; Tatum R; Pandolfino JE
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2017 Apr; 29(4):. PubMed ID: 27739183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How to Optimally Apply Impedance in the Evaluation of Esophageal Dysmotility.
Patel A; Gyawali CP
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2016 Nov; 18(11):60. PubMed ID: 27738965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Normal esophageal pressure topography metrics for data derived from the Sandhill-Unisensor high-resolution manometry assembly in supine and sitting positions.
do Carmo GC; Jafari J; Sifrim D; de Oliveira RB
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):285-92. PubMed ID: 25557525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dysphagia: Novel and Emerging Diagnostic Modalities.
Krause AJ; Carlson DA
Gastroenterol Clin North Am; 2021 Dec; 50(4):769-790. PubMed ID: 34717870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluating esophageal bolus transit by impedance monitoring.
Tutuian R
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2014 Oct; 24(4):595-605. PubMed ID: 25216905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Enhancing High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry: Use of Ancillary Techniques and Maneuvers.
Rogers BD; Gyawali CP
Gastroenterol Clin North Am; 2020 Sep; 49(3):411-426. PubMed ID: 32718561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interrater Reliability of Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry and High-Resolution Manometry for the Assessment of Esophageal Motility Disorders.
Chen JW; Khan A; Chokshi RV; Clarke JO; Fass R; Garza JM; Gupta M; Gyawali CP; Jain AS; Katz P; Konda V; Lazarescu A; Lynch KL; Schnoll-Sussman F; Spechler SJ; Vela MF; Yadlapati R; Schauer JM; Kahrilas PJ; Pandolfino JE; Carlson DA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 118(8):1334-1343. PubMed ID: 37042784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Esophageal motility disorders: new perspectives from high-resolution manometry and histopathology.
Sato H; Takahashi K; Mizuno KI; Hashimoto S; Yokoyama J; Hasegawa G; Terai S
J Gastroenterol; 2018 Apr; 53(4):484-493. PubMed ID: 29134329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Esophageal motor abnormalities in eosinophilic esophagitis identified by high-resolution manometry.
Martín Martín L; Santander C; Lopez Martín MC; Espinoza-Ríos J; Chavarría-Herbozo C; Gisbert JP; Moreno-Otero R
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Sep; 26(9):1447-50. PubMed ID: 21575059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Optimizing the high-resolution manometry (HRM) study protocol.
Patel A; Ding A; Mirza F; Gyawali CP
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):300-4. PubMed ID: 25557304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. What is new in Chicago Classification version 4.0?
Yadlapati R; Pandolfino JE; Fox MR; Bredenoord AJ; Kahrilas PJ
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 Jan; 33(1):e14053. PubMed ID: 33340190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Has high-resolution manometry changed the approach to esophageal motility disorders?
Bansal A; Kahrilas PJ
Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2010 Jul; 26(4):344-51. PubMed ID: 20502325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned.
Rohof WOA; Bredenoord AJ
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2017 Aug; 19(8):37. PubMed ID: 28730503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An analysis of distal esophageal impedance in individuals with and without esophageal motility abnormalities.
Blonski W; Hila A; Vela MF; Castell DO
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 42(7):776-81. PubMed ID: 18360293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Trends in diagnoses after implementation of the Chicago classification for esophageal motility disorders (V3.0) for high-resolution manometry studies.
Laing P; Bress AP; Fang J; Peterson K; Adler DG; Gawron AJ
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Dec; 30(12):1-6. PubMed ID: 28881880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic yield of adding solid food swallows during high-resolution manometry in esophageal motility disorders.
Araujo IK; Roman S; Napoléon M; Mion F
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 May; 33(5):e14060. PubMed ID: 33314459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impaired bolus clearance in combined high-resolution esophageal manometry and impedance measurement helps to differentiate between esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and achalasia.
Zizer E; Seufferlein T; Hänle MM
Z Gastroenterol; 2017 Feb; 55(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 28068730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Esophageal high-resolution manometry demands visual interpretation in addition to mathematical software-based analysis.
Herbella FAM; Patti MG; Schlottmann F
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Apr; 408(1):164. PubMed ID: 37103599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Chicago Classification in pediatric high-resolution esophageal manometry recordings.
Singendonk MM; Smits MJ; Heijting IE; van Wijk MP; Nurko S; Rosen R; Weijenborg PW; Abu-Assi R; Hoekman DR; Kuizenga-Wessel S; Seiboth G; Benninga MA; Omari TI; Kritas S
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 25521418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of Esophageal Contraction Reserve Using HRM in Symptomatic Esophageal Disease.
Penagini R; Gyawali CP
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2019; 53(5):322-330. PubMed ID: 30920423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
