489 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28427271)
1. The value of pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy F-18 FDG PET/CT scans in breast cancer: comparison with MRI.
Choi EK; Yoo IR; Kim SH; Park SY; O JH; Kang BJ
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jan; 59(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 28427271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. FDG-PET/CT and MRI for Evaluation of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
Sheikhbahaei S; Trahan TJ; Xiao J; Taghipour M; Mena E; Connolly RM; Subramaniam RM
Oncologist; 2016 Aug; 21(8):931-9. PubMed ID: 27401897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
Park JS; Moon WK; Lyou CY; Cho N; Kang KW; Chung JK
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 21498321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Volumetric parameters of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography can predict histopathologic treatment response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Nakamoto A; Ota T; Eguchi H; Wakasa K; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Sep; 94():64-69. PubMed ID: 28712692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer assessed with CT and FDG-PET/CT - RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0.
Odawara S; Kitajima K; Katsuura T; Kurahashi Y; Shinohara H; Yamakado K
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():65-71. PubMed ID: 29571803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Staging of locally advanced breast cancer and the prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: complementary role of scintimammography and 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Evangelista L; Cervino AR; Michieletto S; Saibene T; Orvieto E; Bozza F; Ghiotto C
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jun; 61(2):205-215. PubMed ID: 25501326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI and FDG-PET for assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Aiba T; Uehara K; Nihashi T; Tsuzuki T; Yatsuya H; Yoshioka Y; Kato K; Nagino M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):1801-8. PubMed ID: 24531702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility of MRI and PET/CT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: correlation with pathological response grading system based on tumor cellularity.
Kim T; Kang DK; An YS; Yim H; Jung YS; Kim KS; Kang SY; Kim TH
Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 23963151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast tumors: early prediction of chemosensitivity with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Groheux D; Hatt M; Hindié E; Giacchetti S; de Cremoux P; Lehmann-Che J; Martineau A; Marty M; Cuvier C; Cheze-Le Rest C; de Roquancourt A; Visvikis D; Espié M
Cancer; 2013 Jun; 119(11):1960-8. PubMed ID: 23504954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subtype-Guided
Wu S; Wang Y; Li J; Zhang N; Mo M; Klimberg S; Kaklamani V; Cochet A; Shao Z; Cheng J; Liu G
Oncologist; 2020 Apr; 25(4):e626-e633. PubMed ID: 32297448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI and PET/CT for evaluation of the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li H; Yao L; Jin P; Hu L; Li X; Guo T; Yang K
Breast; 2018 Aug; 40():106-115. PubMed ID: 29758503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of
Han S; Choi JY
Breast Cancer Res; 2020 Oct; 22(1):119. PubMed ID: 33129348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can FDG-PET/CT predict early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer?
Andrade WP; Lima EN; Osório CA; do Socorro Maciel M; Baiocchi G; Bitencourt AG; Fanelli MF; Damascena AS; Soares FA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1358-63. PubMed ID: 24120422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer judged by PERCIST - multicenter study in Japan.
Kitajima K; Nakatani K; Yamaguchi K; Nakajo M; Tani A; Ishibashi M; Hosoya K; Morita T; Kinoshita T; Kaida H; Miyoshi Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Sep; 45(10):1661-1671. PubMed ID: 29754160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Textural features of
Cheng L; Zhang J; Wang Y; Xu X; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Liu G; Cheng J
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Aug; 31(7):544-552. PubMed ID: 28646331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT after two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy may predict response in HER2-negative, but not in HER2-positive breast cancer.
Cheng J; Wang Y; Mo M; Bao X; Zhang Y; Liu G; Zhang J; Geng D
Oncotarget; 2015 Oct; 6(30):29388-95. PubMed ID: 26336821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Different
El-Hennawy G; Moustafa H; Omar W; Elkinaai N; Kamel A; Zaki I; Farid N; El-Kholy E
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2020 Nov; 67(11):e28605. PubMed ID: 32706520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer using (18)fluorine-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography and serum carcinoembryonic antigen: a prospective study.
Li QW; Zheng RL; Ling YH; Wang QX; Xiao WW; Zeng ZF; Fan W; Li LR; Gao YH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Aug; 41(8):1448-55. PubMed ID: 27116012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Imaging for Early Prediction of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Comparative Study Using 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Ueda S; Yoshizawa N; Shigekawa T; Takeuchi H; Ogura H; Osaki A; Saeki T; Ueda Y; Yamane T; Kuji I; Sakahara H
J Nucl Med; 2016 Aug; 57(8):1189-95. PubMed ID: 26940765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early assessment with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography can help predict the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer.
Groheux D; Hindié E; Giacchetti S; Hamy AS; Berger F; Merlet P; de Roquancourt A; de Cremoux P; Marty M; Hatt M; Espié M
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jul; 50(11):1864-71. PubMed ID: 24841218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
