656 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28427475)
21. Study filters for non-randomized studies of interventions consistently lacked sensitivity upon external validation.
Hausner E; Metzendorf MI; Richter B; Lotz F; Waffenschmidt S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):171. PubMed ID: 30563471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Are men difficult to find? Identifying male-specific studies in MEDLINE and Embase.
Stewart F; Fraser C; Robertson C; Avenell A; Archibald D; Douglas F; Hoddinott P; van Teijlingen E; Boyers D
Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; 3():78. PubMed ID: 25033713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A review of the reporting of web searching to identify studies for Cochrane systematic reviews.
Briscoe S
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 29065246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada.
Godin K; Stapleton J; Kirkpatrick SI; Hanning RM; Leatherdale ST
Syst Rev; 2015 Oct; 4():138. PubMed ID: 26494010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review.
Cooper C; Booth A; Britten N; Garside R
Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 6(1):234. PubMed ID: 29179733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme.
Briscoe S
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Apr; 8():153. PubMed ID: 25889619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Systematic reviews of factors associated with the onset and progression of neurological conditions in humans: A methodological overview.
Hersi M; Quach P; Wang MD; Gomes J; Gaskin J; Krewski D
Neurotoxicology; 2017 Jul; 61():12-18. PubMed ID: 27377856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.
Sampson M; McGowan J; Tetzlaff J; Cogo E; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):748-54. PubMed ID: 18586178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Choosing and using methodological search filters: searchers' views.
Beale S; Duffy S; Glanville J; Lefebvre C; Wright D; McCool R; Varley D; Boachie C; Fraser C; Harbour J; Smith L
Health Info Libr J; 2014 Jun; 31(2):133-47. PubMed ID: 24754785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Overview: comprehensive and carefully constructed strategies are required when conducting searches for adverse effects data.
Golder S; Peryer G; Loke YK
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():36-43. PubMed ID: 31150833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable?
Booth A; Carroll C
Health Info Libr J; 2015 Sep; 32(3):220-35. PubMed ID: 26095232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development and validation of search filters to retrieve medication discontinuation articles in Medline and Embase.
Morel T; Nguyen-Soenen J; Thompson W; Fournier JP
Health Info Libr J; 2024 Jun; 41(2):156-165. PubMed ID: 38013506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Information retrieval for systematic reviews in food and feed topics: A narrative review.
Wood H; O'Connor A; Sargeant J; Glanville J
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):527-539. PubMed ID: 29316306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Identifying additional studies for a systematic review of retention strategies in randomised controlled trials: making contact with trials units and trial methodologists.
Brueton V; Tierney JF; Stenning S; Rait G
Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 6(1):167. PubMed ID: 28830570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cochrane systematic reviews in acupuncture: methodological diversity in database searching.
Sood A; Sood R; Bauer BA; Ebbert JO
J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Aug; 11(4):719-22. PubMed ID: 16131298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An optimal search filter for retrieving systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Lee E; Dobbins M; Decorby K; McRae L; Tirilis D; Husson H
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Apr; 12():51. PubMed ID: 22512835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Development of a search filter to identify reports of controlled clinical trials within CINAHL Plus.
Glanville J; Dooley G; Wisniewski S; Foxlee R; Noel-Storr A
Health Info Libr J; 2019 Mar; 36(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 30737884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
