BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

848 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28428142)

  • 21. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
    Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.
    Kaminski MF; Regula J; Kraszewska E; Polkowski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Zwierko M; Rupinski M; Nowacki MP; Butruk E
    N Engl J Med; 2010 May; 362(19):1795-803. PubMed ID: 20463339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.
    Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K
    S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.
    Sanaka MR; Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel TD; Podugu A; Thota PN; Lopez R; Kiran RP; Burke CA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 26024584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Defining and Applying Locally Relevant Benchmarks for the Adenoma Detection Rate.
    Hilsden RJ; Rose SM; Dube C; Rostom A; Bridges R; McGregor SE; Brenner DR; Heitman SJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2019 Aug; 114(8):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 30848731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of Quality Measures for Detection of Neoplasia at Screening Colonoscopy.
    Wieszczy P; Bugajski M; Januszewicz W; Rupinska M; Szlak J; Pisera M; Turkot MH; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Regula J; Kaminski MF
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Jan; 21(1):200-209.e6. PubMed ID: 35341951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of feedback on adenoma detection rates: Outcomes of quality improvement program.
    Gurudu SR; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Atia M; Umar SB; Leighton JA; Faigel DO; Ramirez FC
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Mar; 33(3):645-649. PubMed ID: 28892839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence.
    Delavari A; Bishehsari F; Salimzadeh H; Khosravi P; Delavari F; Nasseri-Moghaddam S; Merat S; Ansari R; Vahedi H; Shahbazkhani B; Saberifiroozi M; Sotoudeh M; Malekzadeh R
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 14():196. PubMed ID: 25404264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of adenoma detection rate on detection of advanced adenomas and endoscopic adverse events in a study of over 200,000 screening colonoscopies.
    Penz D; Ferlitsch A; Waldmann E; Irina G; Daniel P; Asaturi A; Hinterberger A; Majcher B; Szymanska A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jan; 91(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 31499041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
    Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Trends in quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria.
    Waldmann E; Gessl I; Sallinger D; Jeschek P; Britto-Arias M; Heinze G; Fasching E; Weiss W; Gschwantler M; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2016 Dec; 48(12):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 27576182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program.
    Brenner H; Altenhofen L; Kretschmann J; Rösch T; Pox C; Stock C; Hoffmeister M
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Aug; 149(2):356-66.e1. PubMed ID: 25911510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates.
    Teng TY; Khor SN; Kailasam M; Cheah WK; Lau CC
    Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1796-803. PubMed ID: 26198158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
    Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficacy of a nationwide screening colonoscopy program for colorectal cancer.
    Pox CP; Altenhofen L; Brenner H; Theilmeier A; Von Stillfried D; Schmiegel W
    Gastroenterology; 2012 Jun; 142(7):1460-7.e2. PubMed ID: 22446606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer.
    Wieszczy P; Regula J; Kaminski MF
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):441-446. PubMed ID: 28842054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors Associated with Surveillance Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.
    Maratt JK; Dickens J; Schoenfeld PS; Elta GH; Jackson K; Rizk D; Erickson C; Menees SB
    Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Dec; 62(12):3579-3585. PubMed ID: 29043592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3).
    Adler A; Wegscheider K; Lieberman D; Aminalai A; Aschenbeck J; Drossel R; Mayr M; Mroß M; Scheel M; Schröder A; Gerber K; Stange G; Roll S; Gauger U; Wiedenmann B; Altenhofen L; Rosch T
    Gut; 2013 Feb; 62(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 22442161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.