These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28428497)

  • 1. [Series: Practical Evaluation of Clinical Image Quality (2): Image Quality Measurements for Digital Radiography Systems].
    Katayama R
    Igaku Butsuri; 2016; 36(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 28428497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Series: Practical Evaluation of Clinical Image Quality (1):Image Quality Verification of Digital Radiography].
    Katayama R
    Igaku Butsuri; 2016; 35(4):307-313. PubMed ID: 28428466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Series: Practical Evaluation of Clinical Image Quality (4): Determination of Image Quality in Digital Radiography System].
    Katayama R
    Igaku Butsuri; 2016; 36(3):166-172. PubMed ID: 28442655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Medical image enhancement: Sharpening].
    Kats L; Vered M
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2015 Apr; 32(2):10-2, 36. PubMed ID: 26255429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Techniques to improve the accuracy of noise power spectrum measurements in digital x-ray imaging based on background trends removal.
    Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1600-10. PubMed ID: 21520872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of image sharpening on radiographic image quality.
    Clark JL; Wadhwani CP; Abramovitch K; Rice DD; Kattadiyil MT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):927-933. PubMed ID: 30166247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantification of the effect of system and object parameters on edge enhancement in phase-contrast radiography.
    Donnelly EF; Price RR; Pickens DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2888-96. PubMed ID: 14655935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image Acquisition and Quality in Digital Radiography.
    Alexander S
    Radiol Technol; 2016 Sep; 88(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 27601691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparative evaluation of six different body regions of the dog using analog and digital radiography].
    Meyer-Lindenberg A; Ebermaier C; Wolvekamp P; Tellhelm B; Meutstege FJ; Lang J; Hartung K; Fehr M; Nolte I
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2008; 121(5-6):216-27. PubMed ID: 18557526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A-Si:H/CsI(Tl) flat-panel versus computed radiography for chest imaging applications: image quality metrics measurement.
    Liu X; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2004 Jan; 31(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 14761026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
    Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Series: Practical Evaluation of Clinical Image Quality (3): Subjective Evaluation of Image Quality in Digital Radiography Systems].
    Katayama R
    Igaku Butsuri; 2016; 36(2):113-120. PubMed ID: 28428454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographers' Ability to Detect Low-Contrast Detail in Digital Radiography Systems.
    Alsleem H; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 87(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 26377266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients.
    Jablanovic D; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Damjanov N; Seric S; Radak-Perovic M; Arandjic D; Maksimovic R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 23185070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.