646 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28429119)
1. Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.
Gungor M; Kahraman K; Dursun P; Ozbasli E; Genim C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 28429119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.
Lopez S; Mulla ZD; Hernandez L; Garza DM; Payne TN; Farnam RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Prodromidou A; Spartalis E; Tsourouflis G; Dimitroulis D; Nikiteas N
J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):679-686. PubMed ID: 31956926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights.
Moawad GN; Abi Khalil ED; Tyan P; Shu MK; Samuel D; Amdur R; Scheib SA; Marfori CQ
J Robot Surg; 2017 Dec; 11(4):433-439. PubMed ID: 28144809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer patients.
Johnson L; Bunn WD; Nguyen L; Rice J; Raj M; Cunningham MJ
J Robot Surg; 2017 Sep; 11(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 27812904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.
Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic single-site plus ONE port distal pancreatectomy.
Kim SH; Kang CM; Lee WJ
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4258-4259. PubMed ID: 28342127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.
Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim HJ; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2014 Sep; 55(5):1222-30. PubMed ID: 25048478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case-matched study.
Yang YS; Kim SY; Hur MH; Oh KY
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):624-31. PubMed ID: 24462594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-Port vs Multiport Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Xie W; Cao D; Yang J; Yu M; Shen K; Zhao L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1049-1056. PubMed ID: 27590569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial experience with single-port robotic hysterectomy.
Gomes MTV; Machado AMN; Podgaec S; Barison GAS
Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2017; 15(4):476-480. PubMed ID: 29364368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic single-site versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study.
Paek J; Lee JD; Kong TW; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1043-50. PubMed ID: 26092018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
