94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28429437)
1. Re: Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials: Local cervical ripening, induction of labour, and caesarean section rate.
Carbillon L
BJOG; 2017 May; 124(6):982-983. PubMed ID: 28429437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Authors' reply re: Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials.
Bernardes T; Groen H;
BJOG; 2017 May; 124(6):983-984. PubMed ID: 28429434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials.
Bernardes TP; Broekhuijsen K; Koopmans CM; Boers KE; van Wyk L; Tajik P; van Pampus MG; Scherjon SA; Mol BW; Franssen MT; van den Berg PP; Groen H
BJOG; 2016 Aug; 123(9):1501-8. PubMed ID: 27173131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and literature review.
Cheuk QK; Lo TK; Lee CP; Yeung AP
Hong Kong Med J; 2015 Jun; 21(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 25999032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of mifepristone usage for cervical ripening and induction of labour in full-term pregnancy. Randomized controlled trial.
Baev OR; Rumyantseva VP; Tysyachnyu OV; Kozlova OA; Sukhikh GT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Oct; 217():144-149. PubMed ID: 28898687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should cervical favourability play a role in the decision for labour induction in gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia at term? An exploratory analysis of the HYPITAT trial.
Tajik P; van der Tuuk K; Koopmans CM; Groen H; van Pampus MG; van der Berg PP; van der Post JA; van Loon AJ; de Groot CJ; Kwee A; Huisjes AJ; van Beek E; Papatsonis DN; Bloemenkamp KW; van Unnik GA; Porath M; Rijnders RJ; Stigter RH; de Boer K; Scheepers HC; Zwinderman AH; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW
BJOG; 2012 Aug; 119(9):1123-30. PubMed ID: 22703475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Benthem M; van Beek E; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van Huizen ME; Oudijk MA; Papatsonis DN; Perquin DA; Porath M; van der Post JA; Rijnders RJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman ME; van Pampus MG; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW;
Lancet; 2011 Dec; 378(9809):2095-103. PubMed ID: 22030144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study.
Jonsson M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jun; 15():136. PubMed ID: 26077416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.
Chen W; Xue J; Peprah MK; Wen SW; Walker M; Gao Y; Tang Y
BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 26538408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
Brouwers JM; Briët JW; Brouwers JR
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Using of Misoprostol for preinduction and induction of labor in term pregnancy].
Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B; Laskowska M; Oleszczuk J
Ginekol Pol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):881-9. PubMed ID: 10715910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E₂ (OPRA study).
Wilkinson C; Bryce R; Adelson P; Turnbull D
BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 24824157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Double-balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice?
De Bonrostro Torralba C; Tejero Cabrejas EL; Marti Gamboa S; Lapresta Moros M; Campillos Maza JM; Castán Mateo S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1135-1143. PubMed ID: 28315935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostaglandin E2 gel In ripening of cervix in induction of labour.
Warke HS; Saraogi RM; Sanjwalla SM
J Postgrad Med; 1999; 45(4):105-9. PubMed ID: 10734347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the Atad catheter for the induction of labour in women who have had a previous Caesarean section--a case series.
Miller TD; Davis G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 45(4):325-7. PubMed ID: 16029302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Induced labor with prostaglandin E2 gel after previous cesarean section].
Behrens O; Goeschen K; Jakob H; Kauffels W
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Mar; 54(3):144-50. PubMed ID: 8188012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening in patients requiring induction of labour.
Caruso A; De Santis L; Carducci B; Ferrazzani S; De Carolis S; Mancuso S
J Int Med Res; 1997; 25(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 9178148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and effectiveness of labour induction after caesarean section using balloon catheter or oxytocin.
Radan AP; Amylidi-Mohr S; Mosimann B; Simillion C; Raio L; Mueller M; Surbek D
Swiss Med Wkly; 2017; 147():w14532. PubMed ID: 29120029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Premature rupture membrane at term with unfavourable cervix].
El Fekih C; Ouerdiane N; Mrezguia C; Mourali M; Douagi M; Abdennebi M; Ben Zineb N
Tunis Med; 2009 Sep; 87(9):603-6. PubMed ID: 20180382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature.
Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Ten Eikelder ML; van Pampus MG; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van der Post JA; van der Salm P; Scheepers HC; Schuitemaker N; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 23870188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
