94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28429437)
21. Predictors of newborn admission after labour induction at term: Bishop score, pre-induction ultrasonography and clinical risk factors.
Tan PC; Suguna S; Vallikkannu N; Hassan J
Singapore Med J; 2008 Mar; 49(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 18362999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Hyaluronidase for cervical priming and induction of labour.
Kavanagh J; Kelly AJ; Thomas J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD003097. PubMed ID: 11406074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A randomised controlled trial comparing 30 mL and 80 mL in Foley catheter for induction of labour after previous Caesarean section.
Manish P; Rathore S; Benjamin SJ; Abraham A; Jeyaseelan V; Mathews JE
Trop Doct; 2016 Oct; 46(4):205-211. PubMed ID: 26774112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effectiveness and safety of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour in unfavourable cervix in 3rd trimester.
Abbasi N; Danish N; Shakoor F; Parveen Z; Bilal SA
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2008; 20(3):33-5. PubMed ID: 19610511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Cervical ripening after previous cesarean section with dinoprostone vaginal insert].
Coste Mazeau P; Catalan C; Eyraud JL; Aubard Y; Gauthier T
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Feb; 45(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 28368799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [The value of RU-486 (mifepristone) in medical indications of the induction of labor at term. Results of a double-blind randomized prospective study (RU-486 versus placebo)].
Lelaidier C; Benifla JL; Fernandez H; Baton C; Bourget P; Bourrier MC; Frydman R
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 8463575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predictors of perinatal outcomes and economic costs for late-term induction of labour.
Oros D; Garcia-Simon R; Clemente J; Fabre E; Romero MA; Montañes A
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 56(3):286-290. PubMed ID: 28600035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Cervical maturation by repeated applications of prostaglandin E2 gel. 186 cases].
Panel P; Bascou V; de Meeus JB; Magnin G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 9265064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix after a cesarean using an osmotic dilator versus vaginal prostaglandin.
Maier JT; Metz M; Watermann N; Li L; Schalinski E; Gauger U; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 28672756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Randomization of two dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in a low resource setting.
Adeniyi AA; Odukogbe AA; Olayemi A; Oladokun O; Adeniji AO; Aimakhu CO; Enakpene C
Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 24714004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Tachysystole Following Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor Is Not Associated with Adverse Outcomes.
Bofill JA; Darby MM; Castillo J; Sawardecker SU; Magann EF; Morrison JC
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(5):487-493. PubMed ID: 27816973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cervical ripening.
Gordon AJ; Calder AA
Br J Hosp Med; 1983 Jul; 30(1):52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 6576839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Induction of labour versus expectant management at term by subgroups of maternal age: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
Walker KF; Malin G; Wilson P; Thornton JG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Feb; 197():1-5. PubMed ID: 26686589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Outpatient cervical ripening in a district general hospital: a five-year retrospective cohort study.
Barnfield L; Neale E; Reynolds S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Apr; 38(3):301-304. PubMed ID: 28920504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The unripe cervix and its management for labour induction.
MacKenzie IZ
Ann Acad Med Singap; 1993 Mar; 22(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 8363326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review.
Crane JM; Butler B; Young DC; Hannah ME
BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1366-76. PubMed ID: 17081181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Does cervical ripening at term using a high volume foley catheter result in a lower caesarean section rate than a low volume foley catheter? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Berndl A; El-Chaar D; Murphy K; McDonald S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Aug; 36(8):678-687. PubMed ID: 25222162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
