These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28429648)

  • 1. The influence of scene context on parafoveal processing of objects.
    Castelhano MS; Pereira EJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jan; 71(1):229-240. PubMed ID: 28429648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading.
    Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):544-55. PubMed ID: 2527961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials.
    Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):381-93. PubMed ID: 22521255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic parafoveal-on-foveal effects and preview benefits in reading: Evidence from Fixation Related Potentials.
    López-Peréz PJ; Dampuré J; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Barber HA
    Brain Lang; 2016 Nov; 162():29-34. PubMed ID: 27513878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lexical integration across saccades in reading.
    Inhoff AW; Tousman S
    Psychol Res; 1990; 52(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 2287696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parafoveal preview effects depend on both preview plausibility and target predictability.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Oct; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 27734767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.
    Schotter ER; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2039-2067. PubMed ID: 27732044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Object-scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm.
    Võ ML; Henderson JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1742-53. PubMed ID: 21607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Out of the corner of my eye: Foveal semantic load modulates parafoveal processing in reading.
    Payne BR; Stites MC; Federmeier KD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1839-1857. PubMed ID: 27428778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic preview benefit during reading.
    Hohenstein S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):166-90. PubMed ID: 23895448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociating parafoveal preview benefit and parafovea-on-fovea effects during reading: A combined eye tracking and EEG study.
    Niefind F; Dimigen O
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1784-1798. PubMed ID: 27680711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictability and parafoveal preview effects in the developing reader: Evidence from eye movements.
    Johnson RL; Oehrlein EC; Roche WL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):973-991. PubMed ID: 29620378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semantic preview benefit in reading English: The effect of initial letter capitalization.
    Rayner K; Schotter ER
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1617-28. PubMed ID: 24820439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals.
    Altarriba J; Kambe G; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):875-90. PubMed ID: 11521853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influences on and consequences of parafoveal preview in reading.
    Luke SG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1675-1682. PubMed ID: 30088258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.
    Johnson RL; Dunne MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 22060141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stable preview difficulty effects in reading with an improved variant of the boundary paradigm.
    Risse S; Seelig S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1632-1645. PubMed ID: 30501560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):519-528. PubMed ID: 27418260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Previewing the neighborhood: the role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading.
    Williams CC; Perea M; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1072-82. PubMed ID: 16846298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.