These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28429948)

  • 21. Robotic surgery in gynecology.
    Holloway RW; Patel SD; Ahmad S
    Scand J Surg; 2009; 98(2):96-109. PubMed ID: 19799047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present, and future.
    Chen CC; Falcone T
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 52(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 19661749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic surgery in gynecology: is the future already here?
    Gitas G; Hanker L; Rody A; Ackermann J; Alkatout I
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Aug; 31(6):815-824. PubMed ID: 34989636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
    El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
    Scheib SA; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Gala RB; Margulies R; Steinberg A; Murphy M; Lukban J; Jeppson P; Aschkenazi S; Olivera C; South M; Lowenstein L; Schaffer J; Balk EM; Sung V;
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 24295923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Update of Robotic Surgery in Benign Gynecological Pathology: Systematic Review.
    Capozzi VA; Scarpelli E; Armano G; Monfardini L; Celardo A; Munno GM; Fortunato N; Vagnetti P; Schettino MT; Grassini G; Labriola D; Loreto C; Torella M; Cianci S
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Apr; 58(4):. PubMed ID: 35454390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic single-port surgery using the da Vinci SP® surgical system for benign gynecologic disease: A preliminary report.
    Shin HJ; Yoo HK; Lee JH; Lee SR; Jeong K; Moon HS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 59(2):243-247. PubMed ID: 32127145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: which should we use?
    Fanfani F; Restaino S; Ercoli A; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Gallotta V; Monterossi G; Cappuccio S; Scambia G
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Aug; 68(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 26633042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Robotic surgery in gynecology].
    Hibner M; Marianowski P; Szymusik I; Wielgós M
    Ginekol Pol; 2012 Dec; 83(12):934-8. PubMed ID: 23488297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perioperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using three robotic arms at a single institution.
    Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT
    Yonsei Med J; 2015 Mar; 56(2):474-81. PubMed ID: 25683998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
    Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
    Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic single-site surgery in benign gynecologic diseases: Experiences and learning curve based on 626 robotic cases at a single institute.
    Yoo HK; Cho A; Cho EH; Kim SJ; Shim JE; Lee SR; Jeong K; Moon HS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1885-1892. PubMed ID: 32686302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: current status.
    Arian SE; Munoz JL; Kim S; Falcone T
    Robot Surg; 2017; 4():7-18. PubMed ID: 30697559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pedagogic Approach in the Surgical Learning: The First Period of "Assistant Surgeon" May Improve the Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy.
    Favre A; Huberlant S; Carbonnel M; Goetgheluck J; Revaux A; Ayoubi JM
    Front Surg; 2016; 3():58. PubMed ID: 27853733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Updates and Controversies of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Surgery.
    Varghese A; Doglioli M; Fader AN
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 62(4):733-748. PubMed ID: 31524659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. ["Learning curve" robotic radical hysterectomy compared to standardized laparoscopy assisted radical vaginal and open radical hysterectomy].
    Pilka R; Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Neubert D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2013 Jan; 78(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 23607379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.