448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28429950)
1. [Can robotic rectal cancer surgery improve quality of total mesorectal excision?].
Langer D; Tučková I; Kalvach J; Ryska M
Rozhl Chir; 2017; 96(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 28429950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic transanal surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasia, transanal total mesorectal excision, and repair of complex fistulae: clinical experience with the first 18 cases at a single institution.
Atallah S; Martin-Perez B; Parra-Davila E; deBeche-Adams T; Nassif G; Albert M; Larach S
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Jul; 19(7):401-10. PubMed ID: 25708682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Rectal cancer within 10 cm. Comparison of the radicality of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques with regard to the circumferential resection margin and the completeness of mesorectal excision].
Dušek T; Ferko A; Orhalmi J; Chobola M; Nikolov DH; Hovorková E; Cermáková E
Rozhl Chir; 2013 Jun; 92(6):312-9. PubMed ID: 23965316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of long-term outcomes.
Asoglu O; Tokmak H; Bakir B; Aliyev V; Saglam S; Iscan Y; Bademler S; Meric S
J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 31313071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Da Vinci assisted surgery for rectal cancer - preliminary results of nonrandomized trial].
Langer D; Kalvach J; Tučková I; Pudil J; Menclová K; Ryska M
Rozhl Chir; 2015 Dec; 94(12):526-30. PubMed ID: 26767904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term outcomes by a transanal approach to total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Marks JH; Myers EA; Zeger EL; Denittis AS; Gummadi M; Marks GJ
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5248-5257. PubMed ID: 28643051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer results in a significantly higher quality of TME specimen compared to the laparoscopic approach-report of a single-center experience.
Aselmann H; Kersebaum JN; Bernsmeier A; Beckmann JH; Möller T; Egberts JH; Schafmayer C; Röcken C; Becker T
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1575-1581. PubMed ID: 29971488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Analysis of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery on 162 cases with rectal neoplasms].
Zhou JJ; Li TG; Lei SL; Chen WD; Liu KJ; Liu B; Yao HL
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 32306607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
Law WL; Foo DCC
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the short-term efficacy of two types of robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Lei Y; Jiang J; Zhu S; Yi B; Li J
Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Jan; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 34846614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparative study of short and long-term outcomes.
Ghezzi TL; Luca F; Valvo M; Corleta OC; Zuccaro M; Cenciarelli S; Biffi R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1072-9. PubMed ID: 24646748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preclinical cadaveric study of transanal robotic proctectomy with total mesorectal excision combined with laparoscopic assistance.
Gomez Ruiz M; Martin Parra I; Calleja Iglesias A; Stein H; Sprinkle S; Manuel Palazuelos C; Alonso Martin J; Cagigas Fernandez C; Castillo Diego J; Gomez Fleitas M
Int J Med Robot; 2015 Jun; 11(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 24574007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Is There Any Difference in the Transanal TME Rectal Approach? : A Single-Center Series of 120 Consecutive Patients.
Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Alline M; Boulay E; Mourregot A; Carrère S; Quénet F; Jarlier M; Rouanet P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 23(5):1594-600. PubMed ID: 26714950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery].
Grade M; Ridwelski K; Voigt I; Ghadimi BM; Mann B
Zentralbl Chir; 2016 Apr; 141(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 27074214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic rectal cancer surgery with single side-docking technique: experience of a tertiary care university hospital.
Petropoulou T; Amin S
J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 32385797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study.
Gómez Ruiz M; Parra IM; Palazuelos CM; Martín JA; Fernández CC; Diego JC; Fleitas MG
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jan; 58(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 25489707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
