238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28430887)
1. Measurement of forces and moments around the maxillary arch for treatment of a simulated lingual incisor and high canine malocclusion using straight and mushroom archwires in fixed lingual appliances.
Owen B; Gullion G; Heo G; Carey JP; Major PW; Romanyk DL
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Nov; 39(6):665-672. PubMed ID: 28430887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The in vitro biomechanics of anterior arch expansion using fixed lingual appliances with coil springs or archwire stops.
Robertson L; Owen B; Heo G; Carey JP; Major PW; Romanyk DL
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):531-538. PubMed ID: 36807468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The biomechanics of posterior maxillary arch expansion using fixed labial and lingual appliances.
Kaur H; Owen B; Tran B; Guan R; Luo J; Granley A; Carey JP; Major PW; Romanyk DL
Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):688-694. PubMed ID: 33378485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C
Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21175021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the force levels among labial and lingual self-ligating and conventional brackets in simulated misaligned teeth.
Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Khawatmi S; Dirk C; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):419-425. PubMed ID: 28339591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.
Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Keilig L; Cornelius D; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 40(6):660-665. PubMed ID: 29546390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of transverse dimensional and incisor changes between wide and narrow orthodontic archwires: a randomized controlled trial.
Ahmed AS; Al-Nimri KS; Ahmed WS
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):338. PubMed ID: 38797781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of passive self-ligation and conventional elastic ligation on orthodontic force in the simulation of a mandibular lateral incisor linguoversion.
Tochigi K; Saze N; Arai K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Mar; 157(3):320-328. PubMed ID: 32115110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of maxillary arch force/couple systems for a simulated high canine malocclusion: Part 1. Passive ligation.
Fok J; Toogood RW; Badawi H; Carey JP; Major PW
Angle Orthod; 2011 Nov; 81(6):953-9. PubMed ID: 21774579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26718381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of wire size on maxillary arch force/couple systems for a simulated high canine malocclusion.
Major PW; Toogood RW; Badawi HM; Carey JP; Seru S
J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 24852959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photo-elastic stress analysis of initial alignment archwires.
Badran SA; Orr JF; Stevenson M; Burden DJ
Eur J Orthod; 2003 Apr; 25(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 12737209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of biomechanical effects between two types of 2 × 4 techniques employing a rocking-chair archwire: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Wang S; Hu M; Wang S; Qi H; Song D; Jiang H
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Aug; 27(8):4617-4631. PubMed ID: 37294355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Friction properties according to vertical and horizontal tooth displacement and bracket type during initial leveling and alignment.
Heo W; Baek SH
Angle Orthod; 2011 Jul; 81(4):653-61. PubMed ID: 21306223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of the torque capacity of a completely customized lingual appliance of the next generation.
Lossdörfer S; Bieber C; Schwestka-Polly R; Wiechmann D
Head Face Med; 2014 Feb; 10():4. PubMed ID: 24502426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorrect measurements and misleading conclusions in the article "Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study".
Wiechmann D; Bantleon HP; Melsen B; Zachrisson B; Hägg U; Canal P; Garcia R; Barthélemi S; Frapier L; Grauer D; Sander C; Diedrich P; Jacobs C; Wehrbein H; Hohoff A; Helms HJ; Schwestka-Polly R
Head Face Med; 2020 Apr; 16(1):7. PubMed ID: 32321577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
