These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28430994)

  • 1. Personhood and Natural Kinds: Why Cognitive Status Need Not Affect Moral Status.
    Vukov J
    J Med Philos; 2017 Jun; 42(3):261-277. PubMed ID: 28430994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
    Agar N
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Feb; 39(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 22923439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Will cognitive enhancement create post-persons? The use(lessness) of induction in determining the likelihood of moral status enhancement.
    Mihailov E; Dragomir A
    Bioethics; 2018 Jun; 32(5):308-313. PubMed ID: 29726022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Profound Intellectual Disability and the Bestowment View of Moral Status.
    Vehmas S; Curtis B
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2017 Jul; 26(3):505-516. PubMed ID: 28541179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Moral Status of Cognitively Enhanced Monkeys and Other Novel Beings.
    Arnason G
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2021 Jul; 30(3):492-503. PubMed ID: 34109929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A critique of the principle of 'respect for autonomy', grounded in African thought.
    Behrens KG
    Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Jun; 18(2):126-134. PubMed ID: 28470830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In defence of newborns: a response to Kingma.
    Colgrove N
    J Med Ethics; 2022 Aug; 48(8):551-553. PubMed ID: 34244343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What moral status should be accorded to those human beings who have profound intellectual disabilities? A reply to Curtis and Vehmas.
    McLachlan HV
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Aug; 42(8):550-1. PubMed ID: 27125988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eight Kinds of Critters: A Moral Taxonomy for the Twenty-Second Century.
    Bess M
    J Med Philos; 2018 Sep; 43(5):585-612. PubMed ID: 30189038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novel Beings: Moral Status and Regulation.
    Lawrence D; Morley S
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2021 Jul; 30(3):415-419. PubMed ID: 34109932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Avoiding the Personhood Issue: Abortion, Identity, and Marquis's 'Future-Like-Ours' Argument.
    Reitan E
    Bioethics; 2016 May; 30(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 26424415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Being human: Why and in what sense it is morally relevant.
    Kipke R
    Bioethics; 2020 Feb; 34(2):148-158. PubMed ID: 31483865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability.
    Curtis B; Vehmas S
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Jan; 42(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 26671165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Moral significance of phenomenal consciousness.
    Levy N; Savulescu J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 177():361-70. PubMed ID: 19818914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'.
    Wrigley A
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e15-8. PubMed ID: 23637455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why the embryo rescue case is a bad argument against embryonic personhood.
    Hendricks P
    Bioethics; 2019 Jul; 33(6):669-673. PubMed ID: 31107557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Engendering moral post-persons: A novel self-help strategy.
    Crutchfield P
    Bioethics; 2020 Sep; 34(7):679-686. PubMed ID: 32037579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The moral status of beings who are not persons: a casuistic argument.
    Wetlesen J
    Environ Values; 1999 Aug; 8(3):287-323. PubMed ID: 15586461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Desirability of Legal Rights for Novel Beings.
    Jowitt J
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2021 Jul; 30(3):504-516. PubMed ID: 34109931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Personhood and the practical.
    Schechtman M
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 31(4):271-83. PubMed ID: 20607613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.