These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28431299)

  • 1. Not that neglected! Base rates influence related and unrelated judgments.
    Białek M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():10-16. PubMed ID: 28431299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A sampling approach to biases in conditional probability judgments: beyond base rate neglect and statistical format.
    Fiedler K; Brinkmann B; Betsch T; Wild B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2000 Sep; 129(3):399-418. PubMed ID: 11006907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Base rates: both neglected and intuitive.
    Pennycook G; Trippas D; Handley SJ; Thompson VA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):544-54. PubMed ID: 24219086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The base rate neglect in episodic memory.
    Lu Y; Nieznański M
    Memory; 2020 Feb; 28(2):270-277. PubMed ID: 31910728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():106-33. PubMed ID: 27570097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the provenance of judgments of conditional probability.
    Zhao J; Shah A; Osherson D
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 19665110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The development of the representativeness heuristic in young children.
    Gualtieri S; Denison S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Oct; 174():60-76. PubMed ID: 29913307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample representativeness affects whether judgments are influenced by base rate or sample size.
    Obrecht NA; Chesney DL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Mar; 142(3):370-82. PubMed ID: 23422291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments.
    Zhu JQ; Sanborn AN; Chater N
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Oct; 127(5):719-748. PubMed ID: 32191073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of causal models in multiple judgments under uncertainty.
    Hayes BK; Hawkins GE; Newell BR; Pasqualino M; Rehder B
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 25238316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reasoning about conjunctive probabilistic concepts in childhood.
    Fisk JE; Slattery R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Sep; 59(3):168-78. PubMed ID: 16248496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An associative framework for probability judgment: an application to biases.
    Cobos PL; Almaraz J; García-Madruga JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):80-96. PubMed ID: 12549585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reasoning with base rates is routine, relatively effortless, and context dependent.
    Pennycook G; Thompson VA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):528-34. PubMed ID: 22427266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natural sample spaces and uncertain belief.
    Gavanski I; Hui C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1992 Nov; 63(5):766-80. PubMed ID: 1447692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The memory state heuristic: A formal model based on repeated recognition judgments.
    Castela M; Erdfelder E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Feb; 43(2):205-225. PubMed ID: 27632560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aging and conditional probability judgments: a global matching approach.
    Spaniol J; Bayen UJ
    Psychol Aging; 2005 Mar; 20(1):165-81. PubMed ID: 15769222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An account of subjective probability judgment for joint events: Conjunctive and disjunctive.
    Fisk JE; Marshall DA; Rogers P; Stock R
    Scand J Psychol; 2019 Oct; 60(5):405-420. PubMed ID: 31242534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exemplars in the mist: the cognitive substrate of the representativeness heuristic.
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Olsson H
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Jun; 49(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 18419587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Schema bias in source monitoring varies with encoding conditions: support for a probability-matching account.
    Kuhlmann BG; Vaterrodt B; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1365-76. PubMed ID: 22545608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of virtual sample size on confidence and causal-strength judgments.
    Liljeholm M; Cheng PW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):157-72. PubMed ID: 19210088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.