These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28431345)

  • 1. Insights into targeting young male drivers with anti-speeding advertising: An application of the Step approach to Message Design and Testing (SatMDT).
    Lewis I; White KM; Ho B; Elliott B; Watson B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jun; 103():129-142. PubMed ID: 28431345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Young drivers' engagement with social interactive technology on their smartphone: Critical beliefs to target in public education messages.
    Gauld CS; Lewis IM; White KM; Watson B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():208-218. PubMed ID: 27543898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of anti-speeding advertisements on the simulated driving behaviour of young drivers.
    Plant BR; Irwin JD; Chekaluk E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Mar; 100():65-74. PubMed ID: 28119216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can anti-speeding messages based on protection motivation theory influence reported speeding intentions?
    Glendon AI; Walker BL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Aug; 57():67-79. PubMed ID: 23643708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender differences in the effectiveness of public education messages aimed at smartphone use among young drivers.
    Gauld CS; Lewis IM; White KM; Watson BC; Rose CT; Fleiter JJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(2):127-132. PubMed ID: 32154732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rank-ordering anti-speeding messages.
    Glendon AI; Prendergast S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105254. PubMed ID: 31470279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating public education messages aimed at monitoring and responding to social interactive technology on smartphones among young drivers.
    Gauld CS; Lewis I; White KM; Fleiter JJ; Watson B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():24-35. PubMed ID: 28463691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selecting anti-speeding messages for roadside application.
    Glendon AI; Lewis I; Levin K; Ho B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():37-49. PubMed ID: 29990612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-reported speed compliance and attitudes towards speeding in a representative sample of drivers in Australia.
    Stephens AN; Nieuwesteeg M; Page-Smith J; Fitzharris M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jun; 103():56-64. PubMed ID: 28384489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The beliefs which motivate young male and female drivers to speed: a comparison of low and high intenders.
    Horvath C; Lewis I; Watson B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():334-41. PubMed ID: 22269517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response efficacy: the key to minimizing rejection and maximizing acceptance of emotion-based anti-speeding messages.
    Lewis IM; Watson B; White KM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Mar; 42(2):459-67. PubMed ID: 20159067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Step approach to Message Design and Testing (SatMDT): A conceptual framework to guide the development and evaluation of persuasive health messages.
    Lewis I; Watson B; White KM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():309-314. PubMed ID: 26362827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual differences in drivers' cognitive processing of road safety messages.
    Kaye SA; White MJ; Lewis IM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():272-81. PubMed ID: 22608267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding the psychological precursors of young drivers' willingness to speed and text while driving.
    Preece C; Watson A; Kaye SA; Fleiter J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():196-204. PubMed ID: 29709730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Young drivers' responses to anti-speeding advertisements: Comparison of self-report and objective measures of persuasive processing and outcomes.
    Kaye SA; Lewis I; Algie J; White MJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 May; 17(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 26302428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extending the explanatory utility of the EPPM beyond fear-based persuasion.
    Lewis I; Watson B; White KM
    Health Commun; 2013; 28(1):84-98. PubMed ID: 23330861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judged effectiveness of threat and coping appraisal anti-speeding messages.
    Cathcart RL; Glendon AI
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():237-248. PubMed ID: 27544888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying visual road environment to establish a speeding prediction model: An examination using naturalistic driving data.
    Yu B; Chen Y; Bao S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():289-298. PubMed ID: 31177040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speeding by young novice drivers: What can personal characteristics and psychosocial theory add to our understanding?
    Scott-Parker B; Hyde MK; Watson B; King MJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():242-50. PubMed ID: 22608268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk to workers or vehicle damage: What makes drivers slow down in work zones?
    Debnath AK; Haworth N; Blackman R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(2):177-181. PubMed ID: 33566712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.