171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28432384)
1. The probability of object-scene co-occurrence influences object identification processes.
Sauvé G; Harmand M; Vanni L; Brodeur MB
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 235(7):2167-2179. PubMed ID: 28432384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ERP correlates of spatially incongruent object identification during scene viewing: contextual expectancy versus simultaneous processing.
Demiral SB; Malcolm GL; Henderson JM
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1271-85. PubMed ID: 22391475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ERP evidence for the influence of scene context on the recognition of ambiguous and unambiguous objects.
Dyck M; Brodeur MB
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jun; 72():43-51. PubMed ID: 25911127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are incongruent objects harder to identify? The functional significance of the N300 component.
Truman A; Mudrik L
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():222-232. PubMed ID: 29885960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age-related changes in the neural dynamics of bottom-up and top-down processing during visual object recognition: an electrophysiological investigation.
Lai LY; Frömer R; Festa EK; Heindel WC
Neurobiol Aging; 2020 Oct; 94():38-49. PubMed ID: 32562874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Synchronous contextual irregularities affect early scene processing: replication and extension.
Mudrik L; Shalgi S; Lamy D; Deouell LY
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56():447-58. PubMed ID: 24593900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiple synergistic effects of emotion and memory on proactive processes leading to scene recognition.
Schettino A; Loeys T; Pourtois G
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():81-95. PubMed ID: 23664944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrated contextual representation for objects' identities and their locations.
Gronau N; Neta M; Bar M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):371-88. PubMed ID: 18004950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of behavioral relevance on the processing of global scene properties: An ERP study.
Hansen NE; Noesen BT; Nador JD; Harel A
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jun; 114():168-180. PubMed ID: 29729276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Causal neural mechanisms of context-based object recognition.
Wischnewski M; Peelen MV
Elife; 2021 Aug; 10():. PubMed ID: 34374647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrophysiological correlates of top-down effects facilitating natural image categorization are disrupted by the attenuation of low spatial frequency information.
Rokszin AA; Győri-Dani D; Nyúl LG; Csifcsák G
Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Feb; 100():19-27. PubMed ID: 26707649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Context and hand posture modulate the neural dynamics of tool-object perception.
Natraj N; Poole V; Mizelle JC; Flumini A; Borghi AM; Wheaton LA
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Feb; 51(3):506-19. PubMed ID: 23261936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tracking the time course of action priming on object recognition: evidence for fast and slow influences of action on perception.
Kiefer M; Sim EJ; Helbig H; Graf M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 23(8):1864-74. PubMed ID: 20617882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The speed of object recognition from a haptic glance: event-related potential evidence.
Gurtubay-Antolin A; Rodriguez-Herreros B; Rodríguez-Fornells A
J Neurophysiol; 2015 May; 113(9):3069-75. PubMed ID: 25744887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrophysiological evidence for separation between human face and non-face object processing only in the right hemisphere.
Niina M; Okamura JY; Wang G
Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Oct; 98(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 26189456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain dynamics of upstream perceptual processes leading to visual object recognition: a high density ERP topographic mapping study.
Schettino A; Loeys T; Delplanque S; Pourtois G
Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1227-41. PubMed ID: 21237274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of scene and object orientation on the scene consistency effect.
Lauer T; Willenbockel V; Maffongelli L; Võ ML
Behav Brain Res; 2020 Sep; 394():112812. PubMed ID: 32682913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of scene summary statistics in object recognition.
Lauer T; Cornelissen THW; Draschkow D; Willenbockel V; Võ ML
Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):14666. PubMed ID: 30279431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fixation-related Brain Potentials during Semantic Integration of Object-Scene Information.
Coco MI; Nuthmann A; Dimigen O
J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 32(4):571-589. PubMed ID: 31765602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrophysiological correlates of object location and object identity processing in spatial scenes.
van Hoogmoed AH; van den Brink D; Janzen G
PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e41180. PubMed ID: 22815960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
