317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28433732)
1. The clinical significance of an estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile: a comparison of outcomes of <5th vs 5th-9th percentile.
Mlynarczyk M; Chauhan SP; Baydoun HA; Wilkes CM; Earhart KR; Zhao Y; Goodier C; Chang E; Lee Plenty NM; Mize EK; Owens M; Babbar S; Maulik D; DeFranco E; McKinney D; Abuhamad AZ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 217(2):198.e1-198.e11. PubMed ID: 28433732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age as predictors of neonatal morbidity: which growth nomogram to use?
Leon-Martinez D; Lundsberg LS; Culhane J; Zhang J; Son M; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 229(6):678.e1-678.e16. PubMed ID: 37348779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Significance and Outcomes of Fetal Growth Restriction Below the 5th Percentile Compared to the 5th to 10th Percentiles on Midgestation Growth Ultrasonography.
Zhang-Rutledge K; Mack LM; Mastrobattista JM; Gandhi M
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2243-2249. PubMed ID: 29476559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age.
Blue NR; Beddow ME; Savabi M; Katukuri VR; Chao CR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 30118689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neonatal Outcomes among Fetuses with an Abdominal Circumference <3rd %ile and Estimated Fetal Weight 3rd to 9th %ile Compared to Fetuses with an EFW <3rd %ile.
Horgan R; Nehme L; Jensen HJ; Shah AP; Saal R; Onishi K; Kawakita T; Martins JG; Abuhamad A
Am J Perinatol; 2024 Jul; 41(9):1120-1125. PubMed ID: 38301725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sonographic growth curves versus neonatal birthweight growth curves for the identification of fetal growth restriction.
Bergman M; Reichman O; Farkash R; Bin-Nun A; Samueloff A; Sapir AZ; Sela HY
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(23):4558-4565. PubMed ID: 33417530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study.
Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan; 4(1):100527. PubMed ID: 34763120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the relation between ultrasound-estimated fetal weight and birthweight in cohort of small-for-gestational-age fetuses.
Stephens K; Al-Memar M; Beattie-Jones S; Dhanjal M; Mappouridou S; Thorne E; Lees C
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Nov; 98(11):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 31090917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive performance of newborn small for gestational age by a United States intrauterine vs birthweight-derived standard for short-term neonatal morbidity and mortality.
Blue NR; Mele L; Grobman WA; Bailit JL; Wapner RJ; Thorp JM; Caritis SN; Prasad M; Tita ATN; Saade GR; Rouse DJ; Blackwell SC;
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 May; 4(3):100599. PubMed ID: 35183799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Third-Trimester Fetal Biometry and Neonatal Outcomes in Term and Preterm Deliveries.
Sheth T; Glantz JC
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jan; 35(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 26643756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnosis of fetal growth restriction in a cohort of small-for-gestational-age neonates at term: neonatal and maternal outcomes.
Pineles BL; Mendez-Figueroa H; Chauhan SP
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Sep; 4(5):100672. PubMed ID: 35667554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of 32 vs 36 weeks ultrasound in predicting late-onset fetal growth restriction and small-for-gestational-age neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mustafa HJ; Javinani A; Muralidharan V; Khalil A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Jan; 6(1):101246. PubMed ID: 38072237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using ultrasound and angiogenic markers from a 19- to 23-week assessment to inform the subsequent diagnosis of preeclampsia.
Lai J; Syngelaki A; Nicolaides KH; von Dadelszen P; Magee LA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):294.e1-294.e11. PubMed ID: 35276067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk of neonatal care unit admission in small for gestational age fetuses at term: a prediction model and internal validation.
Kalafat E; Morales-Rosello J; Thilaganathan B; Dhother J; Khalil A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Jul; 32(14):2361-2368. PubMed ID: 29400112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Term small-for-gestational-age infants from low-risk women are at significantly greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.
Madden JV; Flatley CJ; Kumar S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):525.e1-525.e9. PubMed ID: 29462628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome.
Sovio U; Smith GCS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S738-S744. PubMed ID: 29199029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with "small" fetuses not meeting Delphi consensus criteria for fetal growth restriction.
Powel JE; Chavan NR; Zantow EW; Bialko MF; Farley LG; McCormick KM; Tomlinson TM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 229(4):447.e1-447.e13. PubMed ID: 37767605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal insular measurements in pregnancy with estimated fetal weight <10th centile and childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Putra M; Peek E; Hobbins JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jan; 230(1):85.e1-85.e15. PubMed ID: 37442246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study.
Kadji C; Cannie MM; Kang X; Carlin A; Benjou Etchoua S; Resta S; Dütemeyer V; Abi-Khalil F; Mazzone E; Bevilacqua E; Jani JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):238.e1-238.e12. PubMed ID: 34358479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adverse birth outcomes in relation to prenatal sonographic measurements of fetal size.
Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Ecker J; Feldstein VA; Filly RA; Bacchetti P
J Ultrasound Med; 2003 Apr; 22(4):347-56; quiz 357-8. PubMed ID: 12693618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
