597 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28433867)
1. Validity and repeatability of inertial measurement units for measuring gait parameters.
Washabaugh EP; Kalyanaraman T; Adamczyk PG; Claflin ES; Krishnan C
Gait Posture; 2017 Jun; 55():87-93. PubMed ID: 28433867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity and reliability of wearable inertial sensors in healthy adult walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kobsar D; Charlton JM; Tse CTF; Esculier JF; Graffos A; Krowchuk NM; Thatcher D; Hunt MA
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 May; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 32393301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeatability of spatiotemporal, plantar pressure and force parameters during treadmill walking and running.
Nüesch C; Overberg JA; Schwameder H; Pagenstert G; Mündermann A
Gait Posture; 2018 May; 62():117-123. PubMed ID: 29547791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Accuracy and Precision of Gait Spatio-Temporal Parameters Extracted from an Instrumented Sock during Treadmill and Overground Walking in Healthy Subjects and Patients with a Foot Impairment Secondary to Psoriatic Arthritis.
Walha R; Lebel K; Gaudreault N; Dagenais P; Cereatti A; Della Croce U; Boissy P
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 34577387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and concurrent validity of spatiotemporal stride characteristics measured with an ankle-worn sensor among older individuals.
Rantalainen T; Pirkola H; Karavirta L; Rantanen T; Linnamo V
Gait Posture; 2019 Oct; 74():33-39. PubMed ID: 31442820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of foot placement and its variability with inertial sensors.
Rebula JR; Ojeda LV; Adamczyk PG; Kuo AD
Gait Posture; 2013 Sep; 38(4):974-80. PubMed ID: 23810335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mobile inertial sensor based gait analysis: Validity and reliability of spatiotemporal gait characteristics in healthy seniors.
Donath L; Faude O; Lichtenstein E; Pagenstert G; Nüesch C; Mündermann A
Gait Posture; 2016 Sep; 49():371-374. PubMed ID: 27494305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gait and Axial Spondyloarthritis: Comparative Gait Analysis Study Using Foot-Worn Inertial Sensors.
Soulard J; Vaillant J; Baillet A; Gaudin P; Vuillerme N
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Nov; 9(11):e27087. PubMed ID: 34751663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring markers of aging and knee osteoarthritis gait using inertial measurement units.
Hafer JF; Provenzano SG; Kern KL; Agresta CE; Grant JA; Zernicke RF
J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 99():109567. PubMed ID: 31916999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimation of Ankle Joint Power during Walking Using Two Inertial Sensors.
Jiang X; Gholami M; Khoshnam M; Eng JJ; Menon C
Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jun; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 31234451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inertial measurement unit compared to an optical motion capturing system in post-stroke individuals with foot-drop syndrome.
Feuvrier F; Sijobert B; Azevedo C; Griffiths K; Alonso S; Dupeyron A; Laffont I; Froger J
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 May; 63(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 31009801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of variability in spatiotemporal gait parameters between treadmill and overground walking conditions.
Hollman JH; Watkins MK; Imhoff AC; Braun CE; Akervik KA; Ness DK
Gait Posture; 2016 Jan; 43():204-9. PubMed ID: 26481257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity and reliability of a portable gait analysis system for measuring spatiotemporal gait characteristics: comparison to an instrumented treadmill.
Donath L; Faude O; Lichtenstein E; Nüesch C; Mündermann A
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Jan; 13():6. PubMed ID: 26790409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gait Analysis Using Accelerometry Data from a Single Smartphone: Agreement and Consistency between a Smartphone Application and Gold-Standard Gait Analysis System.
Shahar RT; Agmon M
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(22):. PubMed ID: 34833576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complexity, fractal dynamics and determinism in treadmill ambulation: Implications for clinical biomechanists.
Hollman JH; Watkins MK; Imhoff AC; Braun CE; Akervik KA; Ness DK
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Aug; 37():91-97. PubMed ID: 27380204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normative database of spatiotemporal gait parameters using inertial sensors in typically developing children and young adults.
Voss S; Joyce J; Biskis A; Parulekar M; Armijo N; Zampieri C; Tracy R; Palmer AS; Fefferman M; Ouyang B; Liu Y; Berry-Kravis E; O'Keefe JA
Gait Posture; 2020 Jul; 80():206-213. PubMed ID: 32531757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of a smartphone-based assessment of gait parameters across walking speed and smartphone locations: Body, bag, belt, hand, and pocket.
Silsupadol P; Teja K; Lugade V
Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():516-522. PubMed ID: 28961548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of algorithms for calculating spatiotemporal gait parameters during continuous turning using lumbar and foot mounted inertial measurement units.
Kvist A; Tinmark F; Bezuidenhout L; Reimeringer M; Conradsson DM; Franzén E
J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 162():111907. PubMed ID: 38134464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Concurrent Validity of a Commercial Wireless Trunk Triaxial Accelerometer System for Gait Analysis.
De Ridder R; Lebleu J; Willems T; De Blaiser C; Detrembleur C; Roosen P
J Sport Rehabil; 2019 Aug; 28(6):. PubMed ID: 30747572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units for gait assessment within a post stroke population.
Desai R; Martelli D; Alomar JA; Agrawal S; Quinn L; Bishop L
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2024 Apr; 31(3):235-243. PubMed ID: 37545107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
