BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28433871)

  • 1. Automatic cumulative sums contour detection of FBP-reconstructed multi-object nuclear medicine images.
    Protonotarios NE; Spyrou GM; Kastis GA
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Jun; 85():43-52. PubMed ID: 28433871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the spline reconstruction technique for PET.
    Kastis GA; Kyriakopoulou D; Gaitanis A; Fernández Y; Hutton BF; Fokas AS
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042501. PubMed ID: 24694154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A virtual sinogram method to reduce dental metallic implant artefacts in computed tomography-based attenuation correction for PET.
    Abdoli M; Ay MR; Ahmadian A; Zaidi H
    Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Jan; 31(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19829166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system.
    Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH
    J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NEMA NU4-2008 image quality performance report for the microPET focus 120 and for various transmission and reconstruction methods.
    Bahri MA; Plenevaux A; Warnock G; Luxen A; Seret A
    J Nucl Med; 2009 Oct; 50(10):1730-8. PubMed ID: 19759103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of scatter correction on D2 receptor occupancy measurements using 123I-IBZM SPECT: comparison to 11C-Raclopride PET.
    Bullich S; Cot A; Gallego J; Gunn RN; Suárez M; Pavía J; Ros D; Laruelle M; Catafau AM
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 50(4):1511-8. PubMed ID: 20083205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The attenuated spline reconstruction technique for single photon emission computed tomography.
    Protonotarios NE; Fokas AS; Kostarelos K; Kastis GA
    J R Soc Interface; 2018 Nov; 15(148):. PubMed ID: 30487238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using an external gating signal to estimate noise in PET with an emphasis on tracer avid tumors.
    Schmidtlein CR; Beattie BJ; Bailey DL; Akhurst TJ; Wang W; Gönen M; Kirov AS; Humm JL
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Oct; 55(20):6299-326. PubMed ID: 20924132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of 3DOSEM and MAP algorithms for reconstructing low count SPECT acquisitions.
    Grootjans W; Meeuwis AP; Slump CH; de Geus-Oei LF; Gotthardt M; Visser EP
    Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):311-322. PubMed ID: 26725165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of SPECT-CT Hybrid Imaging Using Iterative Image Reconstruction for Low-Dose CT: A Phantom Study.
    Grosser OS; Kupitz D; Ruf J; Czuczwara D; Steffen IG; Furth C; Thormann M; Loewenthal D; Ricke J; Amthauer H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138658. PubMed ID: 26390216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reduction of dental filling metallic artifacts in CT-based attenuation correction of PET data using weighted virtual sinograms optimized by a genetic algorithm.
    Abdoli M; Ay MR; Ahmadian A; Dierckx RA; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6166-77. PubMed ID: 21302773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the uniformity requirements for SPECT image reconstruction using FBP and OSEM techniques.
    Leong LK; Kruger RL; O'Connor MK
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2001 Jun; 29(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 11376099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
    Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The SRT reconstruction algorithm for semiquantification in PET imaging.
    Kastis GA; Gaitanis A; Samartzis AP; Fokas AS
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5970-82. PubMed ID: 26429272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Porous phantoms for PET and SPECT performance evaluation and quality assurance.
    DiFilippo FP; Price JP; Kelsch DN; Muzic RF
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1183-94. PubMed ID: 15191308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noise correlation in PET, CT, SPECT and PET/CT data evaluated using autocorrelation function: a phantom study on data, reconstructed using FBP and OSEM.
    Razifar P; Sandström M; Schnieder H; Långström B; Maripuu E; Bengtsson E; Bergström M
    BMC Med Imaging; 2005 Aug; 5():5. PubMed ID: 16122383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic anatomy recognition in whole-body PET/CT images.
    Wang H; Udupa JK; Odhner D; Tong Y; Zhao L; Torigian DA
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):613. PubMed ID: 26745953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo simulation of PET and SPECT imaging of 90Y.
    Takahashi A; Himuro K; Yamashita Y; Komiya I; Baba S; Sasaki M
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1926-35. PubMed ID: 25832083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic estimation of detector radial position for contoured SPECT acquisition using CT images on a SPECT/CT system.
    Liu RR; Erwin WD
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2800-8. PubMed ID: 16964856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generalized Gibbs priors based positron emission tomography reconstruction.
    Ma J; Feng Q; Feng Y; Huang J; Chen W
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 Jun; 40(6):565-71. PubMed ID: 20447619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.