These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28434002)

  • 1. In situ Hearing Tests for the Purpose of a Self-Fit Hearing Aid.
    Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 28434002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting reliability and validity of self-directed automatic in situ audiometry: implications for self-fitting hearing AIDS.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Yeend I; Freeston K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 25597456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of conventional and in-situ audiometry on participants with varying levels of sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kiessling J; Leifholz M; Unkel S; Pons-Kühnemann J; Jespersen CT; Pedersen JN
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 25597462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Smartphone-Facilitated In-Situ Hearing Aid Audiometry for Community-Based Hearing Testing.
    Frisby C; De Sousa KC; Eikelboom RH; Mahomed-Asmail F; Moore DR; de Kock T; Manchaiah V; Swanepoel W
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):1019-1032. PubMed ID: 38424667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Stone MA; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 33(3):157-70. PubMed ID: 10439142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.
    Moore BC; Baer T; Ives DT; Marriage J; Salorio-Corbetto M
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 26928003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore 'normal' loudness for speech at different levels.
    Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Jun; 34(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 10905450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In-situ Audiometry Compared to Conventional Audiometry for Hearing Aid Fitting.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Jasper BS; Kjærbøl EF; Jordell DH; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241259704. PubMed ID: 38835268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of the Contour Test in a population of adults with hearing loss.
    Palmer CV; Lindley GA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Jun; 9(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 9644618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Duration, compression, and the aided loudness discomfort level.
    Fortune T; Scheller T
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):329-41. PubMed ID: 10981609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Loudness perception is influenced by long-term hearing aid use.
    Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV
    Audiology; 1999; 38(4):202-5. PubMed ID: 10431906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between pure-tone and speech loudness discomfort levels among hearing-impaired subjects.
    Beattie RC; Boyd RL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 May; 51(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 3702359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test-retest reliability of loudness scaling.
    Robinson K; Gatehouse S
    Ear Hear; 1996 Apr; 17(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 8698158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The contour test of loudness perception.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Taylor IM; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):388-400. PubMed ID: 9360862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Categorical loudness scaling within the scope of hearing aid management].
    von Wedel H; Meister H; Walger M
    HNO; 2000 Mar; 48(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 10768109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimized loudness-function estimation for categorical loudness scaling data.
    Oetting D; Brand T; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():16-27. PubMed ID: 25058812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fitting multichannel-compression hearing aids.
    Dreschler WA
    Audiology; 1992; 31(3):121-31. PubMed ID: 1642563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of frequency content on categorical loudness normalization.
    Garnier S; Micheyl C; Arthaud P; Collet L
    Scand Audiol; 2000; 29(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 11195945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.