These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28434002)

  • 21. [Recruitment detection--a comparison of category loudness scaling and classical supra-threshold audiometry].
    Kiessling J; Pfreimer C; Schubert M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 8851113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hearing AIDS and music.
    Chasin M; Russo FA
    Trends Amplif; 2004; 8(2):35-47. PubMed ID: 15497032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Control of hearing-aid saturated sound pressure level by frequency-shaped output compression limiting.
    McDermott HJ; Dean MR; Dillon H
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 10207954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Expectations, prefitting counseling, and hearing aid outcome.
    Saunders GH; Lewis MS; Forsline A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 May; 20(5):320-34. PubMed ID: 19585963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The relationship between the uncomfortable loudness level and the acoustic reflex threshold for pure tones in normally-hearing and impaired listeners--a meta-analysis.
    Olsen SO
    Audiology; 1999; 38(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 10206514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.
    Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 2601312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The value of ASSR threshold-based bilateral hearing aid fitting in children with difficult or unreliable behavioral audiometry.
    Vlastarakos PV; Vasileiou A; Nikolopoulos TP
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Dec; 96(12):464-468. PubMed ID: 29236269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Better together: reduced compliance after sequential versus simultaneous bilateral hearing aids fitting.
    Lavie L; Banai K; Attias J; Karni A
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 23(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 24096862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The National Acoustic Laboratories' procedure for selecting the saturation sound pressure level of hearing aids: experimental validation.
    Storey L; Dillon H; Yeend I; Wigney D
    Ear Hear; 1998 Aug; 19(4):267-79. PubMed ID: 9728722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validity and reliability of in-situ air conduction thresholds measured through hearing aids coupled to closed and open instant-fit tips.
    O'Brien A; Keidser G; Yeend I; Hartley L; Dillon H
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Dec; 49(12):868-76. PubMed ID: 20812890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Audiometric earphone discomfort level and hearing aid saturation sound pressure level for a 90 decibel input signal (SSPL90) as measured in the human ear canal.
    Leijon A; Harford E; Lidén G; Ringdahl A; Dahlberg AK
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 6618037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rehabilitation plasticity: influence of hearing aid fitting on frequency discrimination performance near the hearing-loss cut-off.
    Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Vesson JF; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 16459036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Self-assessment of hearing in rehabilitative audiology: developments in the USA.
    Schow RL; Brockett J; Sturmak MJ; Longhurst TM
    Br J Audiol; 1989 Feb; 23(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 2706405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relationship between the acoustic reflex threshold and levels of loudness categories in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):308-11. PubMed ID: 10582531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index.
    Mackersie C; Boothroyd A; Lithgow A
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 29894379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt).
    Kiessling J; Schubert M; Archut A
    Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 8881002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.