269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28434071)
1. Repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness measurement with non-contact methods: a comparative study.
Mansoori T; Balakrishna N
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 38(3):959-966. PubMed ID: 28434071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Obtained by RTVue OCT, Lenstar, Sirius Topography, and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Healthy Subjects.
Şimşek A; Bilak Ş; Güler M; Çapkin M; Bilgin B; Reyhan AH
Semin Ophthalmol; 2016; 31(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 25412328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
González-Pérez J; Queiruga Piñeiro J; Sánchez García Á; González Méijome JM
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography.
Li H; Leung CK; Wong L; Cheung CY; Pang CP; Weinreb RN; Lam DS
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):796-801.e2. PubMed ID: 17916376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of topcon optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.
Northey LC; Gifford P; Boneham GC
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1708-14. PubMed ID: 23190715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements by four different optical devices and an ultrasound pachymeter.
Gokcinar NB; Yumusak E; Ornek N; Yorubulut S; Onaran Z
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1589-1598. PubMed ID: 29984376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of central corneal thickness with optical low-coherence reflectometry and ultrasound pachymetry in normal and post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes.
Huang J; Liao N; Savini G; Li Y; Bao F; Yu Y; Yu A; Wang Q
Cornea; 2015 Feb; 34(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 25514702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera.
Gonul S; Koktekir BE; Bakbak B; Gedik S
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014; 77(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 25627178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with standard ultrasonic pachymetry and optical devices.
Doğan M; Ertan E
Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):126-130. PubMed ID: 30557910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three different optical devices.
Üçer MB; Bozkurt E
Ther Adv Ophthalmol; 2021; 13():2515841421995633. PubMed ID: 33748670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anterior ocular biometry using 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography.
Fukuda S; Kawana K; Yasuno Y; Oshika T
Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):882-9. PubMed ID: 19410946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using three different imaging devices.
Kan E; Duran M; Yakar K
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2023 Jun; 46(6):589-595. PubMed ID: 37076388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability and agreement of five imaging systems for measuring anterior segment parameters in healthy eyes.
Kumar M; Shetty R; Jayadev C; Rao HL; Dutta D
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 65(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 28513492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer.
Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Rozema JJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Central corneal thickness measurements obtained with anterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography compared to ultrasound pachymetry in healthy subjects.
Vollmer L; Sowka J; Pizzimenti J; Yu X
Optometry; 2012 May; 83(5):167-72. PubMed ID: 23249119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of central corneal thickness measurement with RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal subjects.
Rao HL; Kumar AU; Kumar A; Chary S; Senthil S; Vaddavalli PK; Garudadri CS
Cornea; 2011 Feb; 30(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 20885314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of central corneal thickness with four noncontact devices: An agreement analysis of swept-source technology.
Ozyol E; Özyol P
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 65(6):461-465. PubMed ID: 28643709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by ultrasound pachymetry, corneal topography, spectral domain- optical coherence tomography, and non-contact specular microscopy.
Ulutas HG; Ozkaya G; Amuk Hamidi N
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Jun; 42():103527. PubMed ID: 36966866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repeatability and reproducibility of a new fully automatic measurement optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and agreement with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer.
Yu J; Zhao G; Lei CS; Wan T; Ning R; Xing W; Ma X; Pan H; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Zhou X; Huang J
Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 108(5):673-678. PubMed ID: 37142332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.
Chen S; Huang J; Wen D; Chen W; Huang D; Wang Q
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 90(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 20560892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
