BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28436047)

  • 1. Propensity scores based methods for estimating average treatment effect and average treatment effect among treated: A comparative study.
    Abdia Y; Kulasekera KB; Datta S; Boakye M; Kong M
    Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):967-985. PubMed ID: 28436047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
    Hattori S; Henmi M
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of average treatment effects among multiple treatment groups by using an ensemble approach.
    Yan X; Abdia Y; Datta S; Kulasekera KB; Ugiliweneza B; Boakye M; Kong M
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(15):2828-2846. PubMed ID: 30941812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On Variance of the Treatment Effect in the Treated When Estimated by Inverse Probability Weighting.
    Reifeis SA; Hudgens MG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 May; 191(6):1092-1097. PubMed ID: 35106534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Closed-form variance estimator for weighted propensity score estimators with survival outcome.
    Hajage D; Chauvet G; Belin L; Lafourcade A; Tubach F; De Rycke Y
    Biom J; 2018 Nov; 60(6):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 30257058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On variance estimation of the inverse probability-of-treatment weighting estimator: A tutorial for different types of propensity score weights.
    Kostouraki A; Hajage D; Rachet B; Williamson EJ; Chauvet G; Belot A; Leyrat C
    Stat Med; 2024 Jun; 43(13):2672-2694. PubMed ID: 38622063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.
    Lefebvre G; Gustafson P
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 15. PubMed ID: 21969999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the use of propensity scores in case of rare exposure.
    Hajage D; Tubach F; Steg PG; Bhatt DL; De Rycke Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():38. PubMed ID: 27036963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity score analysis with local balance.
    Li Y; Li L
    Stat Med; 2023 Jul; 42(15):2637-2660. PubMed ID: 37012676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parametric and nonparametric propensity score estimation in multilevel observational studies.
    Salditt M; Nestler S
    Stat Med; 2023 Oct; 42(23):4147-4176. PubMed ID: 37532119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment.
    Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Propensity score estimators for the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated may yield very different estimates.
    Pirracchio R; Carone M; Rigon MR; Caruana E; Mebazaa A; Chevret S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1938-1954. PubMed ID: 24201469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propensity score and doubly robust methods for estimating the effect of treatment on censored cost.
    Li J; Handorf E; Bekelman J; Mitra N
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):1985-99. PubMed ID: 26678242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subclassification estimation of the weighted average treatment effect.
    Choi BY
    Biom J; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1706-1728. PubMed ID: 34270815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of balancing scores using the ANCOVA approach for estimating average treatment effect: a simulation study.
    Tu C; Koh WY
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(3):508-515. PubMed ID: 30561245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
    Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.