104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28436050)
1. Comparing performance of surgeons using risk-adjusted procedures.
Tang X; Gan FF
Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(16):2601-2613. PubMed ID: 28436050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic probability control limits for risk-adjusted CUSUM charts based on multiresponses.
Zhang X; Loda JB; Woodall WH
Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(16):2547-2558. PubMed ID: 28425116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simple signaling rule for variable life-adjusted display derived from an equivalent risk-adjusted CUSUM chart.
Wittenberg P; Gan FF; Knoth S
Stat Med; 2018 Jul; 37(16):2455-2473. PubMed ID: 29667215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic probability control limits for risk-adjusted Bernoulli CUSUM charts.
Zhang X; Woodall WH
Stat Med; 2015 Nov; 34(25):3336-48. PubMed ID: 26037959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of varying patient populations on the in-control performance of the risk-adjusted CUSUM chart.
Tian W; Sun H; Zhang X; Woodall WH
Int J Qual Health Care; 2015 Feb; 27(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 25487914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relevance of the c-statistic when evaluating risk-adjustment models in surgery.
Merkow RP; Hall BL; Cohen ME; Dimick JB; Wang E; Chow WB; Ko CY; Bilimoria KY
J Am Coll Surg; 2012 May; 214(5):822-30. PubMed ID: 22440055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can acute care surgeons perform while fatigued? An EAST multicenter study.
Schuster KM; Hazelton JP; Rattigan D; Nguyen L; Kim D; Spence LH; Turay D; Luo-Owen X; Perez JM; Dayal S; Blatt M; Hill C; Bhattacharya B
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2018 Sep; 85(3):476-484. PubMed ID: 29787535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of present-on-admission indicators on risk-adjusted hospital mortality measurement.
Dalton JE; Glance LG; Mascha EJ; Ehrlinger J; Chamoun N; Sessler DI
Anesthesiology; 2013 Jun; 118(6):1298-306. PubMed ID: 23503367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk-adjusted CUSUM charts under model error.
Knoth S; Wittenberg P; Gan FF
Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(12):2206-2218. PubMed ID: 30722100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Which hospitals have significantly better or worse than expected mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction patients? Improved risk adjustment with present-at-admission diagnoses.
Stukenborg GJ; Wagner DP; Harrell FE; Oliver MN; Heim SW; Price AL; Han CK; Wolf AM; Connors AF
Circulation; 2007 Dec; 116(25):2960-8. PubMed ID: 18071076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model.
Fazio VW; Tekkis PP; Remzi F; Lavery IC
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Dec; 47(12):2015-24. PubMed ID: 15657649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of risk adjusted clinical outcomes methodology--quality measures on hospital mortality data: a statistical and case study approach.
Lied TR; Kazandjian VA; Hohman SF
Am J Med Qual; 1999; 14(6):255-61. PubMed ID: 10624030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do hospitals and surgeons with higher coronary artery bypass graft surgery volumes still have lower risk-adjusted mortality rates?
Hannan EL; Wu C; Ryan TJ; Bennett E; Culliford AT; Gold JP; Hartman A; Isom OW; Jones RH; McNeil B; Rose EA; Subramanian VA
Circulation; 2003 Aug; 108(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 12885743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new VLAD-based control chart for detecting surgical outcomes.
Yue J; Lai X; Liu L; Lai PBS
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(28):4540-4547. PubMed ID: 28589642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the choice of risk-adjustment model influence the outcome of surgeon-specific mortality analysis? A retrospective analysis of 14,637 patients under 31 surgeons.
Grant SW; Grayson AD; Jackson M; Au J; Fabri BM; Grotte G; Jones M; Bridgewater B
Heart; 2008 Aug; 94(8):1044-9. PubMed ID: 17974700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk-adjusted monitoring of surgical performance.
Li J; Jiang J; Jiang X; Liu L
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200915. PubMed ID: 30089109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus.
Cohen ME; Ko CY; Bilimoria KY; Zhou L; Huffman K; Wang X; Liu Y; Kraemer K; Meng X; Merkow R; Chow W; Matel B; Richards K; Hart AJ; Dimick JB; Hall BL
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Aug; 217(2):336-46.e1. PubMed ID: 23628227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of postoperative complication risk prediction approaches based on factors known preoperatively to surgeons versus patients.
Dahlke AR; Merkow RP; Chung JW; Kinnier CV; Cohen ME; Sohn MW; Paruch J; Holl JL; Bilimoria KY
Surgery; 2014 Jul; 156(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 24890570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Review of the application of risk-adjusted charts to analyse mortality outcomes in critical care.
Cook DA; Duke G; Hart GK; Pilcher D; Mullany D
Crit Care Resusc; 2008 Sep; 10(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 18798724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating Mortality Risk for Adult Congenital Heart Surgery: An Analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database.
Fuller SM; He X; Jacobs JP; Pasquali SK; Gaynor JW; Mascio CE; Hill KD; Jacobs ML; Kim YY
Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Nov; 100(5):1728-35; discussion 1735-6. PubMed ID: 26411754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
