519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28436308)
1. The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement.
Komori H; Kawanabe N; Kataoka T; Kato Y; Fujisawa A; Yamashiro T; Kamioka H
Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 28436308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons of Jaw Line and Face Line after Mandibular Setback: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies.
Chen CM; Tseng YC; Ko EC; Chen MY; Chen KJ; Cheng JH
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1375085. PubMed ID: 30662900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial.
Leung YY; Wang R; Wong NSM; Li DTS; Au SW; Choi WS; Su YX
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 50(7):933-939. PubMed ID: 33168369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial.
Li DTS; Wang R; Wong NSM; Leung YY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 34627665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Postoperative mandibular stability after orthognathic surgery in patients with mandibular protrusion and mandibular deviation.
Lai W; Yamada K; Hanada K; Ali IM; Takagi R; Kobayashi T; Hayashi T
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 11934051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the quality of life changes of patients receiving sagittal split ramus osteotomy or intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Wong NSM; Leung YY
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Apr; 27(4):1435-1448. PubMed ID: 36881158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transitional joint effusion in the mandibular prognathic surgery patient: intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Nishimura M; Segami N; Sato J; Honjou M; Fujimura K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 May; 62(5):545-8. PubMed ID: 15122556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrospective study of changes in the sensitivity of the oral mucosa: sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO).
Hasegawa T; Tateishi C; Asai M; Imai Y; Okamoto N; Shioyasono A; Kimoto A; Akashi M; Suzuki H; Furudoi S; Komori T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 44(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 25468631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Change in condylar long axis and skeletal stability following sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathia.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 63(10):1494-9. PubMed ID: 16182918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of osseous healing after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Rokutanda S; Yamada S; Yanamoto S; Omori K; Fujimura Y; Morita Y; Rokutanda H; Kohara H; Fujishita A; Nakamura T; Yoshimi T; Yoshida N; Umeda M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1316-1321. PubMed ID: 29843949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the skeletal stability after mandibular counter-clockwise rotation in three surgical procedures.
Narahara S; Morita Y; Shido R; Yoshida N; Ohba S
Odontology; 2024 Apr; 112(2):640-646. PubMed ID: 37880466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Condylar and temporomandibular joint disc positions after mandibular osteotomy for prognathism.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Dec; 60(12):1424-32; discussion 1432-4. PubMed ID: 12465004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of skeletal stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with one-day maxillary-mandibular fixation followed by early jaw exercise.
Ohba S; Tasaki H; Tobita T; Minamizato T; Kawasaki T; Motooka N; Watanabe E; Yoshida N; Asahina I
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):586-92. PubMed ID: 23347885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery depending on mandibular surgical techniques: SSRO vs IVRO.
Choi SH; Yoo HJ; Lee JY; Jung YS; Choi JW; Lee KJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1209-15. PubMed ID: 27524382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular setback surgery in monkeys: intraoral vertical versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Zhao Q; Hu J; Wang D; Zhu S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 17428700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variation of plate fixation for mandibular advancement with intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy using endoscopically assisted intraoral rigid or semi-rigid internal fixation: Case series study: Postoperative condylar seating control for mandibular advancement.
Hara S; Mitsugi M; Tatemoto Y
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2012-6. PubMed ID: 26610634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vertical ramus versus sagittal split osteotomies: comparison of stability after mandibular setback.
Yoshioka I; Khanal A; Tominaga K; Horie A; Furuta N; Fukuda J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1138-44. PubMed ID: 18486778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does mandibular osteotomy affect gonial angle in patients with class III deformity? Vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split osteotomy.
Tabrizi R; Pakshir H; Behnia H; Akhlaghi S; Shahsavari N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Aug; 45(8):992-6. PubMed ID: 27012604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of different treatment procedures on the temporomandibular joint after mandibular setback in skeletal class III - A retrospective study.
Ohba S; Tominaga J; Shido R; Koga T; Yamamoto H; Zaiima H; Yoshida N; Asahina I
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Sep; 50(9):712-718. PubMed ID: 35987801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positional changes of the mandibular condyle in unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy combined with intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for asymmetric class III malocclusion.
Park J; Hong KE; Yun JE; Shin ES; Kim CH; Kim BJ; Kim JH
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Oct; 47(5):373-381. PubMed ID: 34713812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
