449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28436405)
1. A comparison of methods for three-class mammograms classification.
Milosevic M; Jovanovic Z; Jankovic D
Technol Health Care; 2017 Aug; 25(4):657-670. PubMed ID: 28436405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of breast cancer detection in mammograms and thermograms.
Milosevic M; Jankovic D; Peulic A
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Feb; 60(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 25720034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-assisted lip diagnosis on Traditional Chinese Medicine using multi-class support vector machines.
Li F; Zhao C; Xia Z; Wang Y; Zhou X; Li GZ
BMC Complement Altern Med; 2012 Aug; 12():127. PubMed ID: 22898352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of support vector machine classification for computer aided detection of breast masses in mammography.
Lesniak JM; Hupse R; Blanc R; Karssemeijer N; Székely G
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Aug; 57(16):5295-307. PubMed ID: 22853938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided mass detection in mammography: false positive reduction via gray-scale invariant ranklet texture features.
Masotti M; Lanconelli N; Campanini R
Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 19291970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Framework of Computer Aided Diagnosis Systems for Cancer Classification Based on Medical Images.
El Houby EMF
J Med Syst; 2018 Jul; 42(8):157. PubMed ID: 29995204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.
Lee HS; Hong H; Jung DC; Park S; Kim J
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3604-3614. PubMed ID: 28376281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thermography based breast cancer detection using texture features and minimum variance quantization.
Milosevic M; Jankovic D; Peulic A
EXCLI J; 2014; 13():1204-15. PubMed ID: 26417334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of breast mass classification using sequential forward floating selection (SFFS) and a support vector machine (SVM) model.
Tan M; Pu J; Zheng B
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Nov; 9(6):1005-20. PubMed ID: 24664267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mass type-specific sparse representation for mass classification in computer-aided detection on mammograms.
Kim DH; Lee SH; Ro YM
Biomed Eng Online; 2013; 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 24564973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. False-positive reduction in computer-aided mass detection using mammographic texture analysis and classification.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Kurek J; Swiderski B; Kruk M; Zagrouba E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():75-83. PubMed ID: 29728249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An Improved CAD System for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Based on Generalized Pseudo-Zernike Moment and Ada-DEWNN Classifier.
Singh SP; Urooj S
J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):105. PubMed ID: 26892455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robust phase-based texture descriptor for classification of breast ultrasound images.
Cai L; Wang X; Wang Y; Guo Y; Yu J; Wang Y
Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Mar; 14():26. PubMed ID: 25889570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A method for the automated classification of benign and malignant masses on digital breast tomosynthesis images using machine learning and radiomic features.
Sakai A; Onishi Y; Matsui M; Adachi H; Teramoto A; Saito K; Fujita H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 31686300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new feature extraction framework based on wavelets for breast cancer diagnosis.
Ergin S; Kilinc O
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Aug; 51():171-82. PubMed ID: 24951852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-invasive automated 3D thyroid lesion classification in ultrasound: a class of ThyroScan™ systems.
Acharya UR; Vinitha Sree S; Krishnan MM; Molinari F; Garberoglio R; Suri JS
Ultrasonics; 2012 Apr; 52(4):508-20. PubMed ID: 22154208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
