BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28438318)

  • 1. The affinities of Homo floresiensis based on phylogenetic analyses of cranial, dental, and postcranial characters.
    Argue D; Groves CP; Lee MSY; Jungers WL
    J Hum Evol; 2017 Jun; 107():107-133. PubMed ID: 28438318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Homo floresiensis-like fossils from the early Middle Pleistocene of Flores.
    van den Bergh GD; Kaifu Y; Kurniawan I; Kono RT; Brumm A; Setiyabudi E; Aziz F; Morwood MJ
    Nature; 2016 Jun; 534(7606):245-8. PubMed ID: 27279221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evolutionary relationships and age of Homo naledi: An assessment using dated Bayesian phylogenetic methods.
    Dembo M; Radovčić D; Garvin HM; Laird MF; Schroeder L; Scott JE; Brophy J; Ackermann RR; Musiba CM; de Ruiter DJ; Mooers AØ; Collard M
    J Hum Evol; 2016 Aug; 97():17-26. PubMed ID: 27457542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The place of Homo floresiensis in human evolution.
    Baab K
    J Anthropol Sci; 2016 Jun; 94():5-18. PubMed ID: 26829572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Homo floresiensis: microcephalic, pygmoid, Australopithecus, or Homo?
    Argue D; Donlon D; Groves C; Wright R
    J Hum Evol; 2006 Oct; 51(4):360-74. PubMed ID: 16919706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Craniofacial morphology of Homo floresiensis: description, taxonomic affinities, and evolutionary implication.
    Kaifu Y; Baba H; Sutikna T; Morwood MJ; Kubo D; Saptomo EW; Jatmiko ; Awe RD; Djubiantono T
    J Hum Evol; 2011 Dec; 61(6):644-82. PubMed ID: 22036083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Homo floresiensis: a cladistic analysis.
    Argue D; Morwood MJ; Sutikna T; Jatmiko ; Saptomo EW
    J Hum Evol; 2009 Nov; 57(5):623-39. PubMed ID: 19628252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unique Dental Morphology of Homo floresiensis and Its Evolutionary Implications.
    Kaifu Y; Kono RT; Sutikna T; Saptomo EW; Jatmiko ; Due Awe R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141614. PubMed ID: 26624612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Further analyses of the structural organization of Homo luzonensis teeth: Evolutionary implications.
    Zanolli C; Kaifu Y; Pan L; Xing S; Mijares AS; Kullmer O; Schrenk F; Corny J; Dizon E; Robles E; Détroit F
    J Hum Evol; 2022 Feb; 163():103124. PubMed ID: 34998272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skull 5 from Dmanisi: Descriptive anatomy, comparative studies, and evolutionary significance.
    Rightmire GP; Ponce de León MS; Lordkipanidze D; Margvelashvili A; Zollikofer CP
    J Hum Evol; 2017 Mar; 104():50-79. PubMed ID: 28317556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Liang Bua Homo floresiensis mandibles and mandibular teeth: a contribution to the comparative morphology of a new hominin species.
    Brown P; Maeda T
    J Hum Evol; 2009 Nov; 57(5):571-96. PubMed ID: 19589559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Homo floresiensis contextualized: a geometric morphometric comparative analysis of fossil and pathological human samples.
    Baab KL; McNulty KP; Harvati K
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e69119. PubMed ID: 23874886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What do cranial bones of LB1 tell us about Homo floresiensis?
    Balzeau A; Charlier P
    J Hum Evol; 2016 Apr; 93():12-24. PubMed ID: 27086053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cladistic analysis of early Homo crania from Swartkrans and Sterkfontein, South Africa.
    Smith HF; Grine FE
    J Hum Evol; 2008 May; 54(5):684-704. PubMed ID: 18289640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skull diversity in the Homo lineage and the relative position of Homo naledi.
    Schroeder L; Scott JE; Garvin HM; Laird MF; Dembo M; Radovčić D; Berger LR; de Ruiter DJ; Ackermann RR
    J Hum Evol; 2017 Mar; 104():124-135. PubMed ID: 27836166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of neurocranial shape in defining the boundaries of an expanded Homo erectus hypodigm.
    Baab KL
    J Hum Evol; 2016 Mar; 92():1-21. PubMed ID: 26989013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reconstructed Homo habilis type OH 7 suggests deep-rooted species diversity in early Homo.
    Spoor F; Gunz P; Neubauer S; Stelzer S; Scott N; Kwekason A; Dean MC
    Nature; 2015 Mar; 519(7541):83-6. PubMed ID: 25739632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Homo floresiensis cranium (LB1): size, scaling, and early Homo affinities.
    Gordon AD; Nevell L; Wood B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Mar; 105(12):4650-5. PubMed ID: 18356300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A single lineage in early Pleistocene Homo: size variation continuity in early Pleistocene Homo crania from East Africa and Georgia.
    Van Arsdale AP; Wolpoff MH
    Evolution; 2013 Mar; 67(3):841-50. PubMed ID: 23461332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-cranial skeletons of hypothyroid cretins show a similar anatomical mosaic as Homo floresiensis.
    Oxnard C; Obendorf PJ; Kefford BJ
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):e13018. PubMed ID: 20885948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.