These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28439320)

  • 1. Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?
    Winther GN; Niedeggen M
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2017; 13(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 28439320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distractor-induced deafness: The effect of multiple auditory distractors on conscious target processing.
    Kern L; Niedeggen M
    Cortex; 2021 Jan; 134():181-194. PubMed ID: 33279811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid serial visual distraction: task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink.
    Visser TA; Bischof WF; Di Lollo V
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Nov; 66(8):1418-32. PubMed ID: 15813204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Event-related potentials of food-induced blindness in the rapid serial visual presentation paradigm.
    Kirsten H; Seib-Pfeifer LE; Schmuck J; Gibbons H
    Appetite; 2023 Jan; 180():106344. PubMed ID: 36240947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness.
    Winther GN; Niedeggen M
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1882-1898. PubMed ID: 28892157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence reveals the effects of trait anxiety on contingent attentional capture.
    Tsai YC; Lu HJ; Chang CF; Liang WK; Muggleton NG; Juan CH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 17(5):973-983. PubMed ID: 28656503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture.
    Ghorashi SM; Zuvic SM; Visser TA; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 12669749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Not looking for any trouble? Purely affective attentional settings do not induce goal-driven attentional capture.
    Brown CRH; Berggren N; Forster S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1150-1165. PubMed ID: 31773510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinct roles of theta and alpha oscillations in the process of contingent attentional capture.
    Zhong C; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2023; 17():1220562. PubMed ID: 37609570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt-onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Chen X; Xu B; Chen Y; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14290. PubMed ID: 36946491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.
    Leblanc E; Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contingent attentional capture across multiple feature dimensions in a temporal search task.
    Ito M; Kawahara JI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():107-13. PubMed ID: 26637932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P
    Kerzel D; Burra N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking.
    Moore KS; Wiemers EA; Kershner A; Belville K; Jasina J; Ransome A; Avanzato J
    J Vis Exp; 2018 Aug; (138):. PubMed ID: 30222145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in the attentional blink.
    Dux PE; Marois R
    PLoS One; 2008 Oct; 3(10):e3330. PubMed ID: 18833325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The time course of the contingent spatial blink.
    Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 16035345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual attentional guidance during smooth pursuit eye movements: Distractor interference is independent of distractor-target similarity.
    Stolte M; Kraus L; Ansorge U
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Dec; 60(12):e14384. PubMed ID: 37431573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional engagement is not sufficient to prevent spatial capture.
    Zivony A; Lamy D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 24043565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.