These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28439744)

  • 1. Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Avondstondt AM; Wallenstein M; D'Adamo CR; Ehsanipoor RM
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):93-96. PubMed ID: 28439744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
    Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A retrospective evaluation of the perioperative drug use and comparison of its cost in robotic vs open surgery for endometrial cancer.
    Agarwal R; Rajanbabu A; Unnikrishnan UG
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):665-672. PubMed ID: 29569172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer.
    Lundin ES; Carlsson P; Wodlin NB; Nilsson L; Kjölhede P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 32863275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
    Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; di Luca Sidozzi A; Sperduti I; Pomati G; Vizza E
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):e39. PubMed ID: 27171672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
    Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
    El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporating robotic-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer staging: Analysis of morbidity and costs.
    Bogani G; Multinu F; Dowdy SC; Cliby WA; Wilson TO; Gostout BS; Weaver AL; Borah BJ; Killian JM; Bijlani A; Angioni S; Mariani A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 May; 141(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 26896826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost variance across obesity class for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy by high-volume gynecologic surgeons.
    Klebanoff JS; Tyan P; Nishikawa M; North A; Amdur R; Sparks A; Kazma JM; Moawad GN
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 32253574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights.
    Moawad GN; Abi Khalil ED; Tyan P; Shu MK; Samuel D; Amdur R; Scheib SA; Marfori CQ
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Dec; 11(4):433-439. PubMed ID: 28144809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer.
    O'Malley DM; Smith B; Fowler JM
    J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):761-8. PubMed ID: 26385835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
    Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-Effectiveness of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications.
    Marino P; Houvenaeghel G; Narducci F; Boyer-Chammard A; Ferron G; Uzan C; Bats AS; Mathevet P; Dessogne P; Guyon F; Rouanet P; Jaffre I; Carcopino X; Perez T; Lambaudie E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1102-8. PubMed ID: 26098092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of robot-specific resources and operating room times: the case of Telelap Alf-X robotic hysterectomy.
    Rossitto C; Gueli Alletti S; Romano F; Fiore A; Coretti S; Oradei M; Ruggeri M; Cicchetti A; Marchetti M; Fanfani F; Scambia G
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Dec; 12(4):613-619. PubMed ID: 26748491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic vs Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer in Elderly Patients: Surgical Outcome, Survival, and Cost Analysis.
    Lindfors A; Åkesson Å; Staf C; Sjöli P; Sundfeldt K; Dahm-Kähler P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 May; 28(4):692-699. PubMed ID: 29557825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.
    Herling SF
    Dan Med J; 2016 Jul; 63(7):. PubMed ID: 27399986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.