These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28439793)

  • 1. Mixed signals: The effect of conflicting reward- and goal-driven biases on selective attention.
    Preciado D; Munneke J; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1297-1310. PubMed ID: 28439793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating the role of exogenous cueing on selection history formation.
    Grubb MA; Christensen G; Albanese J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1282-1288. PubMed ID: 30924059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional capture by alcohol-related stimuli may be activated involuntarily by top-down search goals.
    Brown CRH; Duka T; Forster S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Jul; 235(7):2087-2099. PubMed ID: 29696310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strategic top-down control versus attentional bias by previous reward history.
    Lynn J; Shin M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2207-16. PubMed ID: 26041273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does reward compete with goal-directed and stimulus-driven shifts of attention?
    Bourgeois A; Neveu R; Bayle DJ; Vuilleumier P
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Jan; 31(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 26403682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Was that a threat? Attentional biases by signals of threat.
    Preciado D; Munneke J; Theeuwes J
    Emotion; 2017 Apr; 17(3):478-486. PubMed ID: 27819442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set.
    Munneke J; Hoppenbrouwers SS; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2540-8. PubMed ID: 26178858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reward processing in the value-driven attention network: reward signals tracking cue identity and location.
    Anderson BA
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 12(3):461-467. PubMed ID: 27677944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Awareness is necessary for attentional biases by location-reward association.
    Mine C; Yokoyama T; Takeda Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2002-2016. PubMed ID: 33759117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of temporal contingencies between cue and target onset on spatial attentional capture by subliminal onset cues.
    Schoeberl T; Ansorge U
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1416-1425. PubMed ID: 29766295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociable neural mechanisms underlie value-driven and selection-driven attentional capture.
    Kim H; Anderson BA
    Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 1708():109-115. PubMed ID: 30468726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value-driven attentional capture in neglect.
    Bourgeois A; Saj A; Vuilleumier P
    Cortex; 2018 Dec; 109():260-271. PubMed ID: 30391880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactions among endogenous, exogenous, and agency-driven attentional selection mechanisms in interactive displays.
    Vilanova-Goldstein AC; Huffman G; Brockmole JR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1477-1488. PubMed ID: 35610415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exogenous visual orienting by reward.
    Failing MF; Theeuwes J
    J Vis; 2014 Jan; 14(5):6. PubMed ID: 24819737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test-retest reliability of value-driven attentional capture.
    Anderson BA; Kim H
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):720-726. PubMed ID: 29987775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conflicting rewards: effects of task goals on attention for alcohol cues.
    Godara M; Van Bockstaele B; Wiers RW
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Jun; 34(4):643-655. PubMed ID: 31509067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the relationship between value-driven and stimulus-driven attentional capture.
    Anderson BA; Kim H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):607-613. PubMed ID: 30697647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Appetitive and aversive outcome associations modulate exogenous cueing.
    Bucker B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2253-65. PubMed ID: 27146992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Undeserved reward but not inevitable loss biases attention: Personal control moderates evaluative attentional biases in the additional-singleton paradigm.
    Müller P; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Apr; 76(4):888-904. PubMed ID: 35466816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contingent Attentional Engagement: Stimulus- and Goal-Driven Capture Have Qualitatively Different Consequences.
    Zivony A; Lamy D
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1930-1941. PubMed ID: 30285577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.