These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Reward processing in the value-driven attention network: reward signals tracking cue identity and location. Anderson BA Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 12(3):461-467. PubMed ID: 27677944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Awareness is necessary for attentional biases by location-reward association. Mine C; Yokoyama T; Takeda Y Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2002-2016. PubMed ID: 33759117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of temporal contingencies between cue and target onset on spatial attentional capture by subliminal onset cues. Schoeberl T; Ansorge U Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1416-1425. PubMed ID: 29766295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dissociable neural mechanisms underlie value-driven and selection-driven attentional capture. Kim H; Anderson BA Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 1708():109-115. PubMed ID: 30468726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value-driven attentional capture in neglect. Bourgeois A; Saj A; Vuilleumier P Cortex; 2018 Dec; 109():260-271. PubMed ID: 30391880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interactions among endogenous, exogenous, and agency-driven attentional selection mechanisms in interactive displays. Vilanova-Goldstein AC; Huffman G; Brockmole JR Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1477-1488. PubMed ID: 35610415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Test-retest reliability of value-driven attentional capture. Anderson BA; Kim H Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):720-726. PubMed ID: 29987775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conflicting rewards: effects of task goals on attention for alcohol cues. Godara M; Van Bockstaele B; Wiers RW Cogn Emot; 2020 Jun; 34(4):643-655. PubMed ID: 31509067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the relationship between value-driven and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Anderson BA; Kim H Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):607-613. PubMed ID: 30697647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Undeserved reward but not inevitable loss biases attention: Personal control moderates evaluative attentional biases in the additional-singleton paradigm. Müller P; Wentura D Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Apr; 76(4):888-904. PubMed ID: 35466816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contingent Attentional Engagement: Stimulus- and Goal-Driven Capture Have Qualitatively Different Consequences. Zivony A; Lamy D Psychol Sci; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1930-1941. PubMed ID: 30285577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]