These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28439793)

  • 41. Attention to Stimuli of Learned versus Innate Biological Value Relies on Separate Neural Systems.
    Kaskan PM; Nicholas MA; Dean AM; Murray EA
    J Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 42(49):9242-9252. PubMed ID: 36319119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effect of reward on orienting and reorienting in exogenous cuing.
    Bucker B; Theeuwes J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 14(2):635-46. PubMed ID: 24671762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Attentional capture by Pavlovian reward-signalling distractors in visual search persists when rewards are removed.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Most SB; Theeuwes J; Wiers RW; Le Pelley ME
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226284. PubMed ID: 31830126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Explicit attentional goals unlock implicit spatial statistical learning.
    Zhang Z; Carlisle NB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Aug; 152(8):2125-2137. PubMed ID: 37053400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Textures shape the attentional focus: evidence from exogenous and endogenous cueing.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1644-66. PubMed ID: 23943497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reward-driven modulation of spatial attention in the human frontal eye-field.
    Bourgeois A; Sterpenich V; Iannotti GR; Vuilleumier P
    Neuroimage; 2022 Feb; 247():118846. PubMed ID: 34942365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Spatiotemporal brain dynamics underlying attentional bias modifications.
    Sallard E; Hartmann L; Ptak R; Spierer L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Aug; 130():29-39. PubMed ID: 29883677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Generalisation of value-based attentional priority is category-specific.
    Clement A; Grégoire L; Anderson BA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Oct; 76(10):2401-2409. PubMed ID: 36453711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. On the distinction between value-driven attention and selection history: Evidence from individuals with depressive symptoms.
    Anderson BA; Chiu M; DiBartolo MM; Leal SL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1636-1642. PubMed ID: 28210998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Multiple reward-cue contingencies favor expectancy over uncertainty in shaping the reward-cue attentional salience.
    De Tommaso M; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M
    Psychol Res; 2019 Mar; 83(2):332-346. PubMed ID: 29372304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Interaction between value and perceptual salience in value-driven attentional capture.
    Wang L; Yu H; Zhou X
    J Vis; 2013 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23479463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Enhancement of perceptual representations by endogenous attention biases competition in response selection.
    Klemen J; Verbruggen F; Skelton C; Chambers CD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2514-27. PubMed ID: 21826553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.
    Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Proactive control: Endogenous cueing effects in a two-target attentional blink task.
    Montakhaby Nodeh S; MacLellan E; Milliken B
    Conscious Cogn; 2024 Feb; 118():103648. PubMed ID: 38308911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effects of reward and loss anticipation on attentional bias for reward-related stimuli.
    Jędras P; Jones A; Stancak A; Field M
    Appetite; 2019 Feb; 133():93-100. PubMed ID: 30300670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The influence of reward history on goal-directed visual search.
    Lee DS; Kim AJ; Anderson BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):325-331. PubMed ID: 35048311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Value-driven effects on perceptual averaging.
    Munneke J; Duymaz İ; Corbett JE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):781-794. PubMed ID: 35138578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.