These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28440308)

  • 1. A Variation Code Accounts for the Perceived Roughness of Coarsely Textured Surfaces.
    Goodman JM; Bensmaia SJ
    Sci Rep; 2017 Apr; 7():46699. PubMed ID: 28440308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural coding mechanisms underlying perceived roughness of finely textured surfaces.
    Yoshioka T; Gibb B; Dorsch AK; Hsiao SS; Johnson KO
    J Neurosci; 2001 Sep; 21(17):6905-16. PubMed ID: 11517278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: the relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness.
    Blake DT; Hsiao SS; Johnson KO
    J Neurosci; 1997 Oct; 17(19):7480-9. PubMed ID: 9295394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates.
    Connor CE; Hsiao SS; Phillips JR; Johnson KO
    J Neurosci; 1990 Dec; 10(12):3823-36. PubMed ID: 2269886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Roughness perception in tactile channels: evidence for an opponent process in the sense of touch.
    Gescheider GA; Wright JH
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2013 Sep; 30(3):120-32. PubMed ID: 23952287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The neural code for tactile roughness in the somatosensory nerves.
    Lieber JD; Xia X; Weber AI; Bensmaia SJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Dec; 118(6):3107-3117. PubMed ID: 28855289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical determinants of the shape of the psychophysical curve relating tactile roughness to raised-dot spacing: implications for neuronal coding of roughness.
    Sutu A; Meftah el-M; Chapman CE
    J Neurophysiol; 2013 Mar; 109(5):1403-15. PubMed ID: 23221417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of receptor density on the tactile perception of roughness: implications for neural mechanisms of texture perception.
    Gescheider GA; Wright JH
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2021 Sep; 38(3):202-213. PubMed ID: 34387144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural coding of tactile texture: comparison of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception.
    Connor CE; Johnson KO
    J Neurosci; 1992 Sep; 12(9):3414-26. PubMed ID: 1527586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the relative roles of slowly and rapidly adapting afferent fibers in roughness perception.
    Johnson KO; Hsiao SS
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 1994 May; 72(5):488-97. PubMed ID: 7954078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative effects of the spatial and temporal characteristics of scanned surfaces on human perception of tactile roughness using passive touch.
    Meftah el-M ; Belingard L; Chapman CE
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Jun; 132(3):351-61. PubMed ID: 10883383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: peripheral neural coding in the monkey.
    Lamb GD
    J Physiol; 1983 May; 338():567-87. PubMed ID: 6875971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The coding of roughness.
    Hollins M; Bensmaïa SJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Sep; 61(3):184-95. PubMed ID: 17974313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tactile texture signals in primate primary somatosensory cortex and their relation to subjective roughness intensity.
    Bourgeon S; Dépeault A; Meftah el-M; Chapman CE
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Apr; 115(4):1767-85. PubMed ID: 26763776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facilitation of individual gamma-motoneurones by the discharge of single slowly adapting type 1 mechanoreceptors in cats.
    Davey NJ; Ellaway PH
    J Physiol; 1989 Apr; 411():97-114. PubMed ID: 2614741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of the tactile texture of raised-dot patterns: further evidence of an opponent process in the sense of touch.
    Gescheider GA; Wright JH
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2018 Jun; 35(2):59-68. PubMed ID: 29706104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship Between Spatial Variations in Static Skin Deformation and Perceived Roughness of Macroscopic Surfaces.
    Okamoto S; Oishi A
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 31944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A continuum mechanical model of mechanoreceptive afferent responses to indented spatial patterns.
    Sripati AP; Bensmaia SJ; Johnson KO
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 95(6):3852-64. PubMed ID: 16481453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central neural mechanisms contributing to the perception of tactile roughness.
    Chapman CE; Tremblay F; Jiang W; Belingard L; Meftah el-M
    Behav Brain Res; 2002 Sep; 135(1-2):225-33. PubMed ID: 12356453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of the tactile texture of raised-dot patterns: a multidimensional analysis.
    Gescheider GA; Bolanowski SJ; Greenfield TC; Brunette KE
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2005 Sep; 22(3):127-40. PubMed ID: 16338822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.