These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28440704)

  • 21. Revision hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: when to select dual mobility, large heads, constrained liners, or a standard head size? Testing one hundred thousand hip revisions with artificial intelligence.
    Hernigou P; Tannyeres P; Barbier O; Chenaie P
    Int Orthop; 2023 Aug; 47(8):2003-2011. PubMed ID: 37326696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Comparison of Revision Rates for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Between Dual Mobility and Large Femoral Head Bearings in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Subanalysis by Acetabular Component Size: An Analysis of 106,163 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Hoskins W; Bingham R; Dyer C; Rainbird S; Graves SE
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Sep; 36(9):3233-3240. PubMed ID: 34088570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lower Risk of Revision With 32- and 36-Millimeter Femoral Heads Compared With 28-mm Heads in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparative Single-Center Study (10,104 Hips).
    Matar HE; van Duren BH; Bloch BV; Berber R; James PJ; Manktelow ARJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Apr; 39(4):991-996. PubMed ID: 38661490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Pituckanotai K; Arirachakaran A; Tuchinda H; Putananon C; Nualsalee N; Setrkraising K; Kongtharvonskul J
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):445-455. PubMed ID: 29119371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Berry DJ; von Knoch M; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Nov; 87(11):2456-63. PubMed ID: 16264121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Posterior approach, fracture diagnosis, and american society of anesthesiology class iii-iv are associated with increased risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of 33,337 operations from the finnish arthroplasty register.
    Panula VJ; Ekman EM; Venäläinen MS; Laaksonen I; Klén R; Haapakoski JJ; Eskelinen AP; Elo LL; Mäkelä KT
    Scand J Surg; 2021 Sep; 110(3):351-358. PubMed ID: 32500836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Use of Computer Navigation in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated with a Reduced Rate of Revision for Dislocation: A Study of 6,912 Navigated THA Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Agarwal S; Eckhard L; Walter WL; Peng A; Hatton A; Donnelly B; de Steiger R
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Oct; 103(20):1900-1905. PubMed ID: 34143758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Low revision rate of dual mobility cups after arthroplasty for acute hip fractures: report of 11,857 hip fractures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007-2019).
    Bloemheuvel EM; Van Steenbergen LN; Swierstra BA
    Acta Orthop; 2021 Feb; 92(1):36-39. PubMed ID: 33172317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Changing Surgical Approach From Primary to Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not Associated With Increased Risk of Dislocation or Re-Revisions.
    Harmer JR; Wyles CC; Larson DR; Taunton MJ; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S622-S627. PubMed ID: 35276276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of dual-mobility cup in revision hip arthroplasty reduces the risk for further dislocation: analysis of seven hundred and ninety one first-time revisions performed due to dislocation, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Mohaddes M; Cnudde P; Rolfson O; Wall A; Kärrholm J
    Int Orthop; 2017 Mar; 41(3):583-588. PubMed ID: 28078362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Comparison of Risk of Dislocation and Cause-Specific Revision Between Direct Anterior and Posterior Approach Following Elective Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Charney M; Paxton EW; Stradiotto R; Lee JJ; Hinman AD; Sheth DS; Prentice HA
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1651-1657. PubMed ID: 32057597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Revision risk by using the direct superior approach (DSA) for total hip arthroplasty compared with postero-lateral approach: early nationwide results from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).
    Van Dooren B; Peters RM; Ettema HB; Schreurs BW; Van Steenbergen LN; Bolder SBT; Zijlstra WP
    Acta Orthop; 2023 Apr; 94():158-164. PubMed ID: 37066786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Are ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty associated with reduced revision risk for late dislocation?
    Pitto RP; Garland M; Sedel L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3790-5. PubMed ID: 26070775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Dyer C; Graves SE; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 34978538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Capsular closure outweighs head size in preventing dislocation following revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Pedneault C; Tanzer D; Nooh A; Smith K; Tanzer M
    Hip Int; 2020 Mar; 30(2):141-146. PubMed ID: 31074310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is there a reduction in risk of revision when 36-mm heads instead of 32 mm are used in total hip arthroplasty for patients with proximal femur fractures?
    Tsikandylakis G; Kärrholm JN; Hallan G; Furnes O; Eskelinen A; Mäkelä K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Mohaddes M
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Aug; 91(4):401-407. PubMed ID: 32285736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dual-Mobility versus Large Femoral Heads in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Weintraub MT; DeBenedetti A; Nam D; Darrith B; Baker CM; Waren D; Schwarzkopf R; Courtney PM; Della Valle CJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S206-S210. PubMed ID: 37019309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Creation of a Total Hip Arthroplasty Patient-Specific Dislocation Risk Calculator.
    Wyles CC; Maradit-Kremers H; Larson DR; Lewallen DG; Taunton MJ; Trousdale RT; Pagnano MW; Berry DJ; Sierra RJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Jun; 104(12):1068-1080. PubMed ID: 36149242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robotic Assistance for Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated With Lower Risk of Revision for Dislocation When Compared to Manual Techniques.
    Bendich I; Vigdorchik JM; Sharma AK; Mayman DJ; Sculco PK; Anderson C; Della Valle AG; Su EP; Jerabek SA
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6):1124-1129. PubMed ID: 35124193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Total, hemi, or dual-mobility arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients with neurological disease : analysis of 9,638 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Cnudde PHJ; Nåtman J; Hailer NP; Rogmark C
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Jan; 104-B(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 34969279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.