These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28441270)

  • 1. Improving quality through clinical registries in urology.
    Tyson MD; Barocas DA
    Curr Opin Urol; 2017 Jul; 27(4):375-379. PubMed ID: 28441270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring quality of urology care using a qualified clinical data registry.
    Gadzinski AJ; Cooperberg MR
    Curr Opin Urol; 2018 Jul; 28(4):329-335. PubMed ID: 29847522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The present and future of quality measures and public reporting in neurosurgery.
    Bekelis K; McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Holland CM; Davies J; Devin CJ; Atkins T; Knightly J; Groman R; Zyung I; Asher AL
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E3. PubMed ID: 26621417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collaborative quality improvement.
    Luckenbaugh AN; Miller DC; Ghani KR
    Curr Opin Urol; 2017 Jul; 27(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 28459792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database Qualified Clinical Data Registry: 2015 measure specifications and rationale.
    Parker SL; McGirt MJ; Bekelis K; Holland CM; Davies J; Devin CJ; Atkins T; Knightly J; Groman R; Zyung I; Asher AL
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E4. PubMed ID: 26621418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative: a statewide Collaborative Quality Initiative.
    Chang V; Schwalb JM; Nerenz DR; Pietrantoni L; Jones S; Jankowski M; Oja-Tebbe N; Bartol S; Abdulhak M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E7. PubMed ID: 26621421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
    Johnston PG; Daly PA; Liu E
    Oncologist; 1999; 4(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 10545862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EUROCOURSE lessons learned from and for population-based cancer registries in Europe and their programme owners: Improving performance by research programming for public health and clinical evaluation.
    Coebergh JW; van den Hurk C; Rosso S; Comber H; Storm H; Zanetti R; Sacchetto L; Janssen-Heijnen M; Thong M; Siesling S; van den Eijnden-van Raaij J
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 51(9):997-1017. PubMed ID: 25956208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new era of quality measurement in rheumatology: electronic clinical quality measures and national registries.
    Tonner C; Schmajuk G; Yazdany J
    Curr Opin Rheumatol; 2017 Mar; 29(2):131-137. PubMed ID: 27941392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Database and Registry Research in Orthopaedic Surgery: Part 2: Clinical Registry Data.
    Pugely AJ; Martin CT; Harwood J; Ong KL; Bozic KJ; Callaghan JJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Nov; 97(21):1799-808. PubMed ID: 26537168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Database and registry research in thyroid cancer: striving for a new and improved national thyroid cancer database.
    Mehra S; Tuttle RM; Milas M; Orloff L; Bergman D; Bernet V; Brett E; Cobin R; Doherty G; Judson BL; Klopper J; Lee S; Lupo M; Machac J; Mechanick JI; Randolph G; Ross DS; Smallridge R; Terris D; Tufano R; Alon E; Clain J; DosReis L; Scherl S; Urken ML
    Thyroid; 2015 Feb; 25(2):157-68. PubMed ID: 25517683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quality of cancer registries data has to become 'liquid'.
    Crocetti E
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Nov; 29(6):546-547. PubMed ID: 31738219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pediatric collaborative networks for quality improvement and research.
    Lannon CM; Peterson LE
    Acad Pediatr; 2013; 13(6 Suppl):S69-74. PubMed ID: 24268088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Classifying, measuring and improving the quality of data in trauma registries: A review of the literature.
    O'Reilly GM; Gabbe B; Moore L; Cameron PA
    Injury; 2016 Mar; 47(3):559-67. PubMed ID: 26830127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. One size fits none - a qualitative study investigating nine national quality registries' conditions for use in quality improvement, research and interaction with patients.
    Sparring V; Granström E; Andreen Sachs M; Brommels M; Nyström ME
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Oct; 18(1):802. PubMed ID: 30342511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer.
    Womble PR; Montie JE; Ye Z; Linsell SM; Lane BR; Miller DC;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Jan; 67(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 25159890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Policies to foster quality improvement registries: lessons from the Swedish case.
    Levay C
    J Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 279(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 26435356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality Metrics in Urology.
    Lynam JC; Tessier C; Averch TD
    Urol Pract; 2016 Jan; 3(1):12-17. PubMed ID: 37592708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of databases and registries to enhance colonoscopy quality.
    Logan JR; Lieberman DA
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2010 Oct; 20(4):717-34. PubMed ID: 20889074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of automated data collection from urology offices: improving incidence and treatment reporting in urologic cancers.
    Penberthy LT; McClish D; Agovino P
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(4):141-7. PubMed ID: 21688743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.