These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28442335)

  • 1. Do impulsive individuals benefit more from food go/no-go training? Testing the role of inhibition capacity in the no-go devaluation effect.
    Chen Z; Veling H; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    Appetite; 2018 May; 124():99-110. PubMed ID: 28442335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How does not responding to appetitive stimuli cause devaluation: Evaluative conditioning or response inhibition?
    Chen Z; Veling H; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Dec; 145(12):1687-1701. PubMed ID: 27736134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of attention in explaining the no-go devaluation effect: Effects on appetitive food items.
    Quandt J; Holland RW; Chen Z; Veling H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1119-1133. PubMed ID: 31144856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When not responding to food changes food value: The role of timing.
    Liu H; Holland RW; Veling H
    Appetite; 2023 Aug; 187():106583. PubMed ID: 37121485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Training response inhibition to reduce food consumption: Mechanisms, stimulus specificity and appropriate training protocols.
    Adams RC; Lawrence NS; Verbruggen F; Chambers CD
    Appetite; 2017 Feb; 109():11-23. PubMed ID: 27838443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Explicit and Implicit Devaluation Effects of Food-Specific Response Inhibition Training.
    Tzavella L; Chambers CD
    J Cogn; 2023; 6(1):10. PubMed ID: 36721799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Happy goat says": The effect of a food selection inhibitory control training game of children's response inhibition on eating behavior.
    Jiang Q; He D; Guan W; He X
    Appetite; 2016 Dec; 107():86-92. PubMed ID: 27457969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stopping at the sight of food - How gender and obesity impact on response inhibition.
    Mühlberg C; Mathar D; Villringer A; Horstmann A; Neumann J
    Appetite; 2016 Dec; 107():663-676. PubMed ID: 27592420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Targeting impulsive processes of eating behavior via the internet. Effects on body weight.
    Veling H; van Koningsbruggen GM; Aarts H; Stroebe W
    Appetite; 2014 Jul; 78():102-9. PubMed ID: 24675683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When mere action versus inaction leads to robust preference change.
    Chen Z; Holland RW; Quandt J; Dijksterhuis A; Veling H
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Oct; 117(4):721-740. PubMed ID: 30920280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impulsivity moderates the effect of approach bias modification on healthy food consumption.
    Kakoschke N; Kemps E; Tiggemann M
    Appetite; 2017 Oct; 117():117-125. PubMed ID: 28647384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How partial reinforcement of food cues affects the extinction and reacquisition of appetitive responses. A new model for dieting success?
    van den Akker K; Havermans RC; Bouton ME; Jansen A
    Appetite; 2014 Oct; 81():242-52. PubMed ID: 24973507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approach and inhibition responses to external food cues among average-weight women who binge eat and weight-matched controls.
    Lyu Z; Zheng P; Chen H; Jackson T
    Appetite; 2017 Jan; 108():367-374. PubMed ID: 27789376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. See it, grab it, or STOP! Relationships between trait impulsivity, attentional bias for pictorial food cues and associated response inhibition following in-vivo food cue exposure.
    Lattimore P; Mead BR
    Appetite; 2015 Jul; 90():248-53. PubMed ID: 25817482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Go/no-go training changes food evaluation in both morbidly obese and normal-weight individuals.
    Chen Z; Veling H; de Vries SP; Bijvank BO; Janssen IMC; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2018 Dec; 86(12):980-990. PubMed ID: 30507224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emotional eating and Pavlovian learning: does negative mood facilitate appetitive conditioning?
    Bongers P; van den Akker K; Havermans R; Jansen A
    Appetite; 2015 Jun; 89():226-36. PubMed ID: 25698079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using stop signals to inhibit chronic dieters' responses toward palatable foods.
    Veling H; Aarts H; Papies EK
    Behav Res Ther; 2011 Nov; 49(11):771-80. PubMed ID: 21906724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chocolate equals stop. Chocolate-specific inhibition training reduces chocolate intake and go associations with chocolate.
    Houben K; Jansen A
    Appetite; 2015 Apr; 87():318-23. PubMed ID: 25596041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Double up! Examining the effects of adding inhibition training to food cue exposure in chocolate-loving female students.
    Bongers P; Houben K; Jansen A
    Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():154-162. PubMed ID: 29154884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What Is Trained During Food Go/No-Go Training? A Review Focusing on Mechanisms and a Research Agenda.
    Veling H; Lawrence NS; Chen Z; van Koningsbruggen GM; Holland RW
    Curr Addict Rep; 2017; 4(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 28357193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.