These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28442391)

  • 41. Why misinformation is reported: evidence from a warning and a source-monitoring task.
    Wyler H; Oswald ME
    Memory; 2016 Nov; 24(10):1419-34. PubMed ID: 26754184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The influence of directed attention at encoding on source memory retrieval in the young and old: an ERP study.
    Dulas MR; Duarte A
    Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 1500():55-71. PubMed ID: 23348376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. True and phantom recollection: an fMRI investigation of similar and distinct neural correlates and connectivity.
    Dennis NA; Bowman CR; Vandekar SN
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2982-93. PubMed ID: 22001165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. False memory ≠ false memory: DRM errors are unrelated to the misinformation effect.
    Ost J; Blank H; Davies J; Jones G; Lambert K; Salmon K
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e57939. PubMed ID: 23573186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Children's Use of Memory Editing Strategies to Reject Source Misinformation.
    Moore KN; Lampinen JM; Gallo DA; Adams EJ; Bridges AJ
    Child Dev; 2018 Jan; 89(1):219-234. PubMed ID: 28197997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The neural mechanism underlying recollection is sensitive to the quality of episodic memory: Event related potentials reveal a some-or-none threshold.
    Murray JG; Howie CA; Donaldson DI
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():298-308. PubMed ID: 26143201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Elevated cortisol at retrieval suppresses false memories in parallel with correct memories.
    Diekelmann S; Wilhelm I; Wagner U; Born J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 20465357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. What's the gist? The influence of schemas on the neural correlates underlying true and false memories.
    Webb CE; Turney IC; Dennis NA
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):61-75. PubMed ID: 27697593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Counterfactual imagination impairs memory for true actions: EEG and behavioural evidence.
    Dhammapeera P; Brunskill C; Hellerstedt R; Bergström ZM
    Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Jan; 15(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 38362597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. "Disorganized in time": impact of bottom-up and top-down negative emotion generation on memory formation among healthy and traumatized adolescents.
    Guillery-Girard B; Clochon P; Giffard B; Viard A; Egler PJ; Baleyte JM; Eustache F; Dayan J
    J Physiol Paris; 2013 Sep; 107(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 23542547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Decoding Episodic Retrieval Processes: Frontoparietal and Medial Temporal Lobe Contributions to Free Recall.
    Kragel JE; Polyn SM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):125-39. PubMed ID: 26401811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prime time news: the influence of primed positive and negative emotion on susceptibility to false memories.
    Porter S; ten Brinke L; Riley SN; Baker A
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(8):1422-34. PubMed ID: 24552271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Complex slow potential generators in a simplified attention paradigm.
    Basile LF; Brunetti EP; Pereira JF; Ballester G; Amaro E; Anghinah R; Ribeiro P; Piedade R; Gattaz WF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 16313987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Encoding focus alters diagnostic recollection and event-related potentials (ERPs).
    Leynes PA; Mok BA
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Oct; 117():1-11. PubMed ID: 28683338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Telling a good story: The effects of memory retrieval and context processing on eyewitness suggestibility.
    LaPaglia JA; Chan JCK
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212592. PubMed ID: 30789952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. What versus where: Investigating how autobiographical memory retrieval differs when accessed with thematic versus spatial information.
    Sheldon S; Chu S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1909-1921. PubMed ID: 27439143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Protective effects of testing across misinformation formats in the household scene paradigm.
    Pereverseff RS; Bodner GE; Huff MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Mar; 73(3):425-441. PubMed ID: 31561745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Fluency affects source memory for familiar names in younger and older adults: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Komes J; Schweinberger SR; Wiese H
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 92():90-105. PubMed ID: 24531047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Individual differences in false memory from misinformation: cognitive factors.
    Zhu B; Chen C; Loftus EF; Lin C; He Q; Chen C; Li H; Xue G; Lu Z; Dong Q
    Memory; 2010 Jul; 18(5):543-55. PubMed ID: 20623420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.