210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28443215)
21. Evaluating the CO
He H; Tian C; Jin G; Han K
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Jun; 192(7):462. PubMed ID: 32601812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comprehensive Evaluation System of Occupational Hazard Prevention and Control in Iron and Steel Enterprises Based on A Modified Delphi Technique.
Song Y; Chen Z; Zhang S; Wang J; Li C; Li X; Yuan J; Zhang X
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jan; 17(2):. PubMed ID: 31968580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Customer knowledge management competence evaluation of agritourism enterprises by using the balanced scorecard and fuzzy-AHP: Evidence from Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle.
Chen G; Zhang J; Tan W; Zhang S; Yan B
PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0280482. PubMed ID: 36758008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A method for controlling enterprises access to an eco-industrial park.
Zhu L; Zhou J; Cui Z; Liu L
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4817-25. PubMed ID: 20624630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risk assessment and hierarchical risk management of enterprises in chemical industrial parks based on catastrophe theory.
Chen Y; Song G; Yang F; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Liu Z
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2012 Dec; 9(12):4386-402. PubMed ID: 23208298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of multiple environmental factors for swine building assessment and control.
Xie Q; Ni JQ; Su Z
J Hazard Mater; 2017 Oct; 340():463-471. PubMed ID: 28759867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Based AHP and Fuzzy COPRAS for Machine Tool Evaluation.
Nguyen HT; Md Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Aoyama H; Case K
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0133599. PubMed ID: 26368541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluating Pillar Industry's Transformation Capability: A Case Study of Two Chinese Steel-Based Cities.
Li Z; Marinova D; Guo X; Gao Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139576. PubMed ID: 26422266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to determine product usability: A proposed theoretical framework.
Zhou R; Chan AH
Work; 2017; 56(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 28035943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based risk priority number for risk assessments of commissioning process of a ring gantry LINAC.
Chang J; Jang S; Lalonde R; Huq SM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Nov; 23(11):e13760. PubMed ID: 35998202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Research on Learning Evaluation of College Students Based on AHP and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation.
Wu H; Sun X; Li D; Zhao Y
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():9160695. PubMed ID: 36397788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Research on assessment methods for urban public transport development in China.
Zou L; Dai H; Yao E; Jiang T; Guo H
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2014; 2014():941347. PubMed ID: 25530756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Integrated fuzzy evaluation of water eutrophication based on GIS in the Taihu Lake].
Gong SQ; Huang JZ; Li YM; Wei YC; Gu ZF
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2005 Sep; 26(5):34-7. PubMed ID: 16366466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Environmental Compliance and Enterprise Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises.
Liu M; Liu Y; Zhao Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33671184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Environmental Gini Coefficient for Allocation of Regional Flood Drainage Rights.
Zhang D; Shen J; Liu P; Zhang Q; Sun F
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32244959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multi-index fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model with information entropy of alfalfa salt tolerance based on LiDAR data and hyperspectral image data.
Zhang J; Zhang A; Liu Z; He W; Yang S
Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1200501. PubMed ID: 37662154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A combination of extended fuzzy AHP and fuzzy GRA for government E-tendering in hybrid fuzzy environment.
Wang Y; Xi C; Zhang S; Yu D; Zhang W; Li Y
ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():123675. PubMed ID: 25057506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to determine product usability: A test case.
Zhou R; Chan AH
Work; 2017; 56(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 28035942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of passenger satisfaction of urban multi-mode public transport.
Zhang X; Liu H; Xu M; Mao C; Shi J; Meng G; Wu J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0241004. PubMed ID: 33079972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Exploring Evaluation of Enterprise Economic Benefits Using Big Data.
Liu X; Li Y
J Environ Public Health; 2022; 2022():1103561. PubMed ID: 35800338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
