These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. [Rectangular or circular x-ray cones for intraoral radiography?]. Eliasson S; Fjellstrom CA Tandlakartidningen; 1982 Jan; 74(1-2):12-7. PubMed ID: 6954706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Dental X-ray equipment and new advances in film production]. Bornvall O; Eckerdal O; Tammisalo EH Tandlakartidningen; 1982 Nov; 74(21):1193-5, 1197, 1199. PubMed ID: 6963017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Educational use of indirect digital radiographic imaging. Bourgeois M; Sikorski P; Wood RE J Can Dent Assoc; 1995 Nov; 61(11):968-70, 974. PubMed ID: 8521325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Image contrast in various cassette-screen-film combinations]. Barth HH; Grasser H Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Dec; 40(12):1230-4. PubMed ID: 3869536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Clinical application of modified dental intensifying screen (author's transl)]. Luo WF Zhonghua Kou Qiang Ke Za Zhi; 1982; 17(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 6955156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Electronic imaging in the dental office. Miles DA; Davis ER J Can Dent Assoc; 1993 Jun; 59(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 8513416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of D- and E-speed intraoral film. Kaugars GE; Harmon FJ; Kaugars CC Gen Dent; 1984; 32(4):316-7. PubMed ID: 6590413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The quality of the X-ray image: fault analysis. Brocklebank LM Dent Update; 1998 Jun; 25(5):188-90, 192-4. PubMed ID: 18170953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Grassl U; Schulze RK Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Effect of solution depletion on image quality in the dental automatic processor (P-10)]. Naitoh M; Yasui S; Ushida M; Ishigaki S; Nishimura A; Shiojima M; Kikuchi A; Tamada A; Matsuo A Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1986 Jun; 24(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 3466551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A study of the quality of duplicated radiographs. Erales FA; Manson-Hing LR Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Jan; 47(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 282572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A densitometric evaluation of two radiographic duplicating films under differing conditions of exposure and processing. Price C Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Aug; 50(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 6930620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Monitoring image quality and analysis of radiographs in dental and maxillofacial radiology]. Mlosek K; Dobrowolny R Czas Stomatol; 1985 Aug; 38(8):572-8. PubMed ID: 3869916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Microdensitometric analysis of interdental bone structure; the development of a registration method. Trouerbach WT; Hoornstra K; Zwamborn AW Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1984; 13(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 6586587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The use of a grid for dental radiography. Baird D Br Dent J; 1984 Aug; 157(4):122. PubMed ID: 6591939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]