1085 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28444168)
1. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.
Head SJ; Çelik M; Kappetein AP
Eur Heart J; 2017 Jul; 38(28):2183-2191. PubMed ID: 28444168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.
Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedure in Patients with Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Deterioration.
Reul RM; Ramchandani MK; Reardon MJ
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2017; 13(3):132-141. PubMed ID: 29743998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is early antithrombotic therapy necessary in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves in normal sinus rhythm?
ElBardissi AW; DiBardino DJ; Chen FY; Yamashita MH; Cohn LH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 May; 139(5):1137-45. PubMed ID: 20303508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: Revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old.
Schnittman SR; Adams DH; Itagaki S; Toyoda N; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):539-547.e9. PubMed ID: 29110948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis.
McClure RS; McGurk S; Cevasco M; Maloney A; Gosev I; Wiegerinck EM; Salvio G; Tokmaji G; Borstlap W; Nauta F; Cohn LH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1931-9. PubMed ID: 24521965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patients.
Nielsen PH; Hjortdal V; Modrau IS; Jensen H; Kimose HH; Terp K; Poulsen SH; Smerup M; Nielsen SL
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1705-10. PubMed ID: 26984983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A guide to fluoroscopic identification and design of bioprosthetic valves: a reference for valve-in-valve procedure.
Bapat V; Mydin I; Chadalavada S; Tehrani H; Attia R; Thomas M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Apr; 81(5):853-61. PubMed ID: 22431472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves.
Eggebrecht H; Schäfer U; Treede H; Boekstegers P; Babin-Ebell J; Ferrari M; Möllmann H; Baumgartner H; Carrel T; Kahlert P; Lange P; Walther T; Erbel R; Mehta RH; Thielmann M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov; 4(11):1218-27. PubMed ID: 22115663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
Chiang YP; Chikwe J; Moskowitz AJ; Itagaki S; Adams DH; Egorova NN
JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(13):1323-9. PubMed ID: 25268439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Selection of Valve Prostheses.
Rosu C; Soltesz EG
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015; 27(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 26686441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Selection of prosthetic heart valves for adult patients by age].
Hashimoto K
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Mar; 108(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 17405540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients <65 years old.
Kaneko T; Aranki S; Javed Q; McGurk S; Shekar P; Davidson M; Cohn L
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 24079878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A systematic review on durability and structural valve deterioration in TAVR and surgical AVR.
Okutucu S; Niazi AK; Oliveira D; Fatihoglu SG; Oto A
Acta Cardiol; 2021 Nov; 76(9):921-932. PubMed ID: 33302806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival and Long-Term Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 55 to 65 Years.
Alex S; Hiebert B; Arora R; Menkis A; Shah P
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 66(4):313-321. PubMed ID: 28511244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
