34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28444179)
1. A novel method for superimposition and measurements on maxillary digital 3D models-studies on validity and reliability.
Ganzer N; Feldmann I; Liv P; Bondemark L
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28444179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of different techniques for 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental casts on palatal structures.
Vasilakos G; Schilling R; Halazonetis D; Gkantidis N
Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5838. PubMed ID: 28724930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of regular dental cast artifacts on the 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental models.
Henninger E; Vasilakos G; Halazonetis D; Gkantidis N
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10501. PubMed ID: 31324833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement error and reliability of three available 3D superimposition methods in growing patients.
Ponce-Garcia C; Ruellas ACO; Cevidanes LHS; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Lagravere-Vich M
Head Face Med; 2020 Jan; 16(1):1. PubMed ID: 31987041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of techniques used for superimposition of maxillary and mandibular 3D surface models to evaluate tooth movement: a systematic review.
Stucki S; Gkantidis N
Eur J Orthod; 2020 Nov; 42(5):559-570. PubMed ID: 31742598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An innovative 3D-3D superimposition for assessing anatomical uniqueness of frontal sinuses through segmentation on CT scans.
Gibelli D; Cellina M; Cappella A; Gibelli S; Panzeri MM; Oliva AG; Termine G; De Angelis D; Cattaneo C; Sforza C
Int J Legal Med; 2019 Jul; 133(4):1159-1165. PubMed ID: 30039273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Superimposition of virtual models using palatal rugae and maximum habitual intercuspation.
Holz IS; Carvalho FAR; Almeida RCC
Dental Press J Orthod; 2024; 29(2):e24spe2. PubMed ID: 38775602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does aligner refinement have the same efficiency in deep bite correction?: A retrospective study.
Kang J; Jeon HH; Shahabuddin N
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):338. PubMed ID: 38491450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Superimposition of dental models to determine orthodontic tooth movements : Comparison of different superimposition methods in vitro and in vivo.
Schmitz J; Keilig L; Daratsianos N; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38345616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methods of measuring distal canine movement and rotation- A review.
Nahidh M; Yassir YA
J Orthod Sci; 2023; 12():25. PubMed ID: 37351417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of maxillary anterior teeth during retention and 1 year after removal of retention-an RCT on adolescents retained with two different bonded retainers and a vacuum-formed retainer.
Naraghi S; Ganzer N; Bondemark L; Sonesson M
Eur J Orthod; 2023 Nov; 45(6):629-636. PubMed ID: 37119264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A method based on 3D affine alignment for the quantification of palatal expansion.
Maggiordomo A; Farronato M; Tartaglia G; Tarini M
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278301. PubMed ID: 36584107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of three-dimensional digital model superimpositions based on palatal structures in patients with maximum anterior tooth retraction following premolar extraction.
Liu J; Koh KM; Choi SH; Kim JH; Cha JY
Korean J Orthod; 2022 Jul; 52(4):258-267. PubMed ID: 35875849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of canine retraction and anchorage loss in different facial types with and without piezocision: a split-mouth-design, randomized clinical trial.
Al-A'athal HS; Al-Nimri K; Alhammadi MS
Angle Orthod; 2022 Nov; 92(6):746-754. PubMed ID: 35852456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Tooth Movement Accuracy with Aligners: A Prospective Study.
D'Antò V; Bucci R; De Simone V; Huanca Ghislanzoni L; Michelotti A; Rongo R
Materials (Basel); 2022 Apr; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 35407978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital model superimpositions: are different software algorithms equally accurate in quantifying linear tooth movements?
Adel SM; Vaid NR; El-Harouni N; Kassem H; Zaher AR
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):103. PubMed ID: 35361187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison between stereophotogrammetry and smartphone structured light technology for three-dimensional face scanning.
D'Ettorre G; Farronato M; Candida E; Quinzi V; Grippaudo C
Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):358-363. PubMed ID: 35015071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the choice of the reference model affect the results of 3D-3D superimposition procedure? A comparison of different protocols for personal identification.
Palamenghi A; De Angelis D; Cellina M; Sforza C; Cattaneo C; Gibelli D
Int J Legal Med; 2021 Sep; 135(5):1879-1886. PubMed ID: 33758971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D-analysis of unwanted tooth movements despite bonded orthodontic retainers: a pilot study.
Klaus K; Xirouchaki F; Ruf S
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):308. PubMed ID: 33148238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
