260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28444523)
1. IOP measurement in silicone oil tamponade eyes by Corvis ST tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry.
Zhang Y; Zheng L; Bian A; Zhou Q
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):697-703. PubMed ID: 28444523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of intraocular pressure using Goldmann applanation tonometry versus non-contact tonometry in eyes with high-viscosity silicone oil.
Pagoulatos DD; Kapsala ZG; Makri OE; Georgalas IG; Georgakopoulos CD
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 30(3):494-499. PubMed ID: 30832494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Goldmann Applanation Tonometry versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry after Vitrectomy with Silicone Oil Endotamponade.
Fuest M; Mamas N; Walter P; Mazinani BE; Roessler G; Plange N
Curr Eye Res; 2017 Jul; 42(7):1007-1012. PubMed ID: 28121186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement of intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST, non-contact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in children with ocular hypertension and related factors.
Li HG; Chen YH; Lin F; Li SY; Liu QH; Yin CG; Chen XY; Zhang XJ; Qu Y; Hui YN
Int J Ophthalmol; 2023; 16(10):1601-1607. PubMed ID: 37854370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Pachymetry and intraocular pressure measurement by corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST): A clinical comparison to the gold standard].
Steinberg J; Mehlan J; Frings A; Druchkiv V; Richard G; Katz T; Linke SJ
Ophthalmologe; 2015 Sep; 112(9):770-7. PubMed ID: 25501931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison between Goldmann, Icare Pro and Corvis ST tonometry].
Bañeros-Rojas P; Martinez de la Casa JM; Arribas-Pardo P; Berrozpe-Villabona C; Toro-Utrera P; García-Feijoó J
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2014 Jul; 89(7):260-4. PubMed ID: 24814401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of differences in intraocular pressure evaluation performed with contact and non-contact devices.
Lanza M; Rinaldi M; Carnevale UAG; di Staso S; Sconocchia MB; Costagliola C
BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):233. PubMed ID: 30176825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Reznicek L; Muth D; Kampik A; Neubauer AS; Hirneiss C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 23969314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Mansoori T; Balakrishna N
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 29044716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.
Kamel K; Dervan E; Falzon K; O'Brien C
Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by non-contact air puff versus Goldmann applanation tonometers in gas-filled vitrectomized eyes.
Patikulsila D; Taweemankongsab S; Ngamtipakorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 May; 86(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 12859105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry After Vitrectomy.
Mamas N; Fuest M; Koutsonas A; Roessler G; Mazinani BE; Walter P; Plange N
J Glaucoma; 2016 Aug; 25(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 26950584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Tonnu PA; Ho T; Newson T; El Sheikh A; Sharma K; White E; Bunce C; Garway-Heath D
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):851-4. PubMed ID: 15965165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes.
Marini M; Da Pozzo S; Accardo A; Canziani T
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comparison of the Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by the Corvis ST and Reichert 7CR Tonometers in Glaucoma Patients.
Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okimoto S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170206. PubMed ID: 28095506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of intraocular pressure obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer, Corvis ST and an airpuff tonometer in healthy adults.
Karmiris E; Tsiripidis K; Gartaganis PS; Totou S; Vasilopoulou MG; Patelis A; Giannakis I; Chalkiadaki E
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; ():11206721211069227. PubMed ID: 34955039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
